feature-development-workflow

feature-development-workflow is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge. It costs 48 tokens per session (1,864 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow guide for implementing an authorised new feature. It sorts work by complexity and sets expectations for decisions, implementation, integration, review, and completion.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding a user-visible capability, such as workspace exports or notification preferences, and when the work needs decisions, implementation evidence, review, and a completion report.
Why use it?
It helps teams apply an amount of process that matches the size and risk of a feature, while avoiding feature-specific gates for fixes, refactors, documentation, or planning.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Good fit Use it when adding a user-visible capability, such as workspace exports or notification preferences, and when the work needs decisions, implementation evidence, review, and a completion report.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge --skill feature-development-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for feature-development-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for feature-development-workflow

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/feature-development-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,864 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.01864
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00746
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00373
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00186

Measured 6d ago against content hash c64450743702, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

feature-development-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (tests/test_skill_contract.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

pi-skill-feature-development-workflow/skills/feature-development-workflow/SKILL.md · 124 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Feature Development Workflow

Use this skill for a user-authorized request to deliver a new capability. It preserves decision, implementation, review, and completion evidence while scaling the process to the feature's actual risk and scope. It is guidance, not a runtime guard: loading this skill does not install a package, enable an integration, change settings, or create hard enforcement.

When to Use

Use when the request adds a user-visible, product, system, interface, workflow, or integration capability and the agent is expected to implement it.

Do not use for:

  • Bug fixes that restore documented or intended existing behavior.
  • Refactors with no new capability.
  • Documentation-only, test-only, formatting-only, or dependency-maintenance work.
  • Planning, research, review, troubleshooting, incident response, operations, or a question without requested feature delivery.
  • Installation, enablement, publication, deployment, or configuration changes unless that action is separately authorized.

Should trigger

  • “Add a workspace export feature with authorization rules and a CSV download.”
  • “Implement a new notification preference channel and migrate existing defaults.”
  • “Create a small user-facing toggle that enables the requested display behavior.”
  • “Build this new integration endpoint and deliver it with tests.”

Should not trigger

  • “Fix the crash when an empty CSV is uploaded.”
  • “Refactor the cache module without changing behavior.”
  • “Add API documentation and unit tests for the existing endpoint.”
  • “Research options for notification providers before we choose one.”
  • “Review this pull request for security issues.”

Ambiguous requests

A request such as “add a tiny flag” may be a feature, a bug fix, or a configuration change. Inspect the affected behavior and user intent before routing. If it is feature delivery, classify it; otherwise use the workflow appropriate to the actual task.

Invocation Design

  • Invocation mode: model-invoked after explicit package enablement.
  • Leading concept: feature implementation workflow.
  • Route only when delivery of a new capability is requested; do not use this as a catch-all engineering process.
  • Creation of this package is inert. Review it before any later installation or enablement, which requires explicit authorization.

Read the full file on GitHub · 124 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago Changed · +3 lines c64450743702
  2. 1mo ago First seen · 121 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A be5cc80db4eb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

feature-development-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge (91 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,864 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

convex-component-authoring

How to create, structure, and publish self-contained Convex components with proper isolation, exports, and dependency management.

waynesutton/convexskills · 28 tokens

npm-docs

Use this skill whenever the user asks about npm, package management, publishing packages, semantic versioning, npm CLI commands, or Node.js dependencies. Covers npm 12.x including the registry, scopes, organizations, security (audit, provenance, 2FA), CI/CD integration, workspaces, scripts, .npmrc configuration, and…

pledgeandgrow/pledge-skills · 91 tokens

convex-component-authoring

How to create, structure, and publish self-contained Convex components with proper isolation, exports, and dependency management.

J-StaR-Films-Studios/VibeCode-Protocol-Suite · 28 tokens

dependency-manager

Manage project dependencies — update packages, audit vulnerabilities, resolve conflicts, and keep dependencies healthy. Use when updating packages, fixing vulnerability alerts, or resolving dependency issues.

asgarovf/locusai · 35 tokens

colab-finetuning

Fine-tune LLMs on Google Colab GPUs directly from openscience. Connects to Colab runtimes via WebSocket bridge for remote training with Unsloth. Supports SFT, GRPO, DPO, vision, and TTS workflows on free T4 to Pro A100 GPUs.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 67 tokens

swarm-pr-review

Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…

ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm · 91 tokens