Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/paper-summarizernpx skills add Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge --skill paper-summarizergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/paper-summarizer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/paper-summarizer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/paper-summarizer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00954 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00477 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
paper-summarizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to paper-summarizer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 114 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Summarizer
Extract actionable insights from academic and technical papers.
Summary Format
# Paper Summary: <Paper Title>
**Authors:** [Author list]
**Published:** [Journal/Conference, Date]
**Link:** [URL]
**Quality:** Peer-reviewed / Preprint / Workshop paper
## TL;DR
[1-2 sentence summary of the key contribution]
## Problem
[What problem does this paper address? Why does it matter?]
## Approach
[Methodology in plain language — what did they do?]
## Key Findings
Anchor each finding to the paper so readers can verify. Use **§** for sections, **Fig.** / **Table** when the evidence is visual or tabular.
1. **[Finding 1]:** [Description with key metrics/numbers] — *Evidence:* §[N] [section name]; [Fig. X / Table Y if applicable]
2. **[Finding 2]:** [Description] — *Evidence:* §[N] …
3. **[Finding 3]:** [Description] — *Evidence:* §[N] …
## Claim–evidence map
| # | Claim (one line) | Where in paper | Type |
|---|------------------|----------------|------|
| 1 | [Claim] | §3.2 Results, Table 2 | Empirical |
| 2 | [Claim] | §1 Introduction | Stated goal |
| 3 | [Claim] | Fig. 4 | Qualitative |
Use this table for **citation audit** alignment (`workspace-researcher/AGENTS.md`). If the PDF has no section numbers, use **page** or **heading text** instead of §.
## Practical Implications
[What does this mean for practitioners? How can we use these findings?]
- For our stack: [Specific applicability to Rust/TS/Python work]
- For our projects: [How this might inform current work]
## Limitations
- [Limitation 1: e.g., small sample size, specific domain]
- [Limitation 2: e.g., not replicated, theoretical only]
## Related Work
- [Paper 1] — [How it relates]
- [Paper 2] — [How it relates]
## Verdict
**Reliability:** High / Medium / Low
**Relevance to us:** High / Medium / Low
**Action:** Apply directly / Consider for future / Interesting but not actionable
Process
Step 1 — Access the Paper
- Check arXiv, PubMed, Google Scholar for open-access versions
- If behind a paywall, note this and work with the abstract and any available supplementary material
- Check for author's personal page (often has preprints)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 114 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A b646c4d202bc
paper-summarizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge (77 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 954 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to paper-summarizer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
Avant-Garde Frontend Architect
Expert frontend design and UI implementation with a focus on bespoke, visually striking, and minimalist interfaces. Trigger with 'ULTRATHINK' prefix for deep architectural analysis. Automatically detects and uses existing UI libraries (Shadcn UI, Radix, MUI) while applying unique styling. Includes a personalized…
FPEF Evidence Analyzer
Systematic Find-Prove-Evidence-Fix framework for complex system analysis and intervention. Use when debugging failures, investigating incidents, analyzing performance issues, or optimizing complex systems.
MCP Universal Manager
Auto-discovery and health monitoring for MCP servers across Claude Code, Factory Droid, Antigravity, Gemini, and other AI platforms. Use when managing MCP servers, monitoring tool integration, or debugging MCP connectivity issues.
council
Run a 5-adviser council to stress-test any decision. Five distinct lenses (Contrarian, First-Principles, Expansionist, Outsider, Executor) answer independently, then anonymously peer-review each other, and a Chairman synthesizes a single clear recommendation. Kills sycophancy and groupthink on high-stakes calls.
UltraPlan Autonomous Planner
Advanced autonomous planning system with viral automation, predictive support, and $100M ARR methodology. Use when creating strategic plans, scaling operations, or implementing autonomous business systems.
compound-engineering
Orchestration layer that coordinates Debt-Sentinel, Red Team Tribunal, and Spec-Lock into unified workflows. Use when you need comprehensive quality assurance with multiple validation stages. Provides safe-edit workflows, CI pipelines, enhancement pipelines, and engineering metrics dashboard.