Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fjpulidop/specrails-core. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fjpulidop/specrails-core/main/.codex/skills/openspec-apply-change/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fjpulidop/specrails-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/openspec-apply-change)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/openspec-apply-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/openspec-apply-change/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/openspec-apply-change"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/openspec-apply-change.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01205 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00602 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
openspec-apply-change scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to openspec-apply-change — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes and use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select
Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g.,
/opsx:apply <other>). -
Check status to understand the schema
openspec status --change "<name>" --jsonParse the JSON to understand:
schemaName: The workflow being used (e.g., "spec-driven")planningHome,changeRoot, andactionContext: planning scope and edit constraints- Which artifact contains the tasks (typically "tasks" for spec-driven, check status for others)
-
Get apply instructions
openspec instructions apply --change "<name>" --jsonThis returns:
contextFiles: artifact ID -> array of concrete file paths (varies by schema - could be proposal/specs/design/tasks or spec/tests/implementation/docs)- Progress (total, complete, remaining)
- Task list with status
- Dynamic instruction based on current state
Handle states:
- If
state: "blocked"(missing artifacts): show message, suggest using openspec-continue-change - If
state: "all_done": congratulate, suggest archive - Otherwise: proceed to implementation
Workspace guard: If status JSON reports
actionContext.mode: "workspace-planning"andallowedEditRootsis empty, explain that full workspace apply is not supported in this slice. Treat linked repos and folders as read-only context, ask the user to select an affected area through an explicit implementation workflow, and STOP before editing files. -
Read context files
Read every file path listed under
contextFilesfrom the apply instructions output. The files depend on the schema being used:- spec-driven: proposal, specs, design, tasks
- Other schemas: follow the contextFiles from CLI output
-
Show current progress
Display:
- Schema being used
- Progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- Remaining tasks overview
- Dynamic instruction from CLI
-
Implement tasks (loop until done or blocked)
For each pending task:
- Show which task is being worked on
- Make the code changes required
- Keep changes minimal and focused
- Mark task complete in the tasks file:
- [ ]→- [x] - Continue to next task
Pause if:
- Task is unclear → ask for clarification
- Implementation reveals a design issue → suggest updating artifacts
- Error or blocker encountered → report and wait for guidance
- User interrupts
-
On completion or pause, show status
Display:
- Tasks completed this session
- Overall progress: "N/M tasks complete"
- If all done: suggest archive
- If paused: explain why and wait for guidance
Output During Implementation
## Implementing: <change-name> (schema: <schema-name>)
Working on task 3/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Working on task 4/7: <task description>
[...implementation happening...]
✓ Task complete
Output On Completion
## Implementation Complete
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 7/7 tasks complete ✓
### Completed This Session
- [x] Task 1
- [x] Task 2
...
All tasks complete! Ready to archive this change.
Output On Pause (Issue Encountered)
## Implementation Paused
**Change:** <change-name>
**Schema:** <schema-name>
**Progress:** 4/7 tasks complete
### Issue Encountered
<description of the issue>
**Options:**
1. <option 1>
2. <option 2>
3. Other approach
What would you like to do?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 160 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A da3d97f3ea48
openspec-apply-change is a skill published in the GitHub repository fjpulidop/specrails-core (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,205 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to openspec-apply-change, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-execution-planner
Plan a repository task for execution by a small local coding model, then hand the plan to the local executor over MCP. Inspect the codebase, decompose the work into self-contained sequential prompts, define deterministic eval gates, validate the manifest, and submit it for execution. Never implement the task.
taiyi-evolve
A workflow skill that compares the implemented code with the frozen design after development and testing. It records architecture changes and proposes updates to DESIGN.md, the document describing the intended system structure.
taiyi-diagram-c4
A code-scanning tool that builds C4 architecture documents from a repository. It separates facts observed in the code from conclusions inferred about the design and uses Mermaid diagrams as the source format.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…