Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-continuenpx skills add fjpulidop/specrails-core --skill opsx-continuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fjpulidop/specrails-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-continue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-continue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-continue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01335 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00668 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00267 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
opsx-continue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OpenSpec project root. The
openspec/directory lives in the REPO, not the workspace this skill is driven from. The repo root is${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}(a default-unset env var: when unset it resolves to., i.e. the current directory, so a classic in-repo run is unchanged). Run EVERYopenspeccommand against that root — wrap each invocation as(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec …). Treat${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}as the OpenSpec project root for any path the CLI prints or you read/write.
Continue working on a change by creating the next artifact.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
Steps
-
If no change name provided, prompt for selection
Run
openspec list --jsonto get available changes sorted by most recently modified. Then use the AskUserQuestion tool to let the user select which change to work on.Present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Schema (from
schemafield if present, otherwise "spec-driven") - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from
lastModifiedfield)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to continue.
IMPORTANT: Do NOT guess or auto-select a change. Always let the user choose.
-
Check current status
(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec status --change "<name>" --json)Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "ready", "blocked")isComplete: Boolean indicating if all artifacts are complete
-
Act based on status:
If all artifacts are complete (
isComplete: true):- Congratulate the user
- Show final status including the schema used
- Suggest: "All artifacts created! You can now implement this change or archive it."
- STOP
If artifacts are ready to create (status shows artifacts with
status: "ready"):- Pick the FIRST artifact with
status: "ready"from the status output - Get its instructions:
(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec instructions <artifact-id> --change "<name>" --json) - Parse the JSON. The key fields are:
context: Project background (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)rules: Artifact-specific rules (constraints for you - do NOT include in output)template: The structure to use for your output fileinstruction: Schema-specific guidanceoutputPath: Where to write the artifactdependencies: Completed artifacts to read for context
- Create the artifact file:
- Read any completed dependency files for context
- Use
templateas the structure - fill in its sections - Apply
contextandrulesas constraints when writing - but do NOT copy them into the file - Write to the output path specified in instructions
- Show what was created and what's now unlocked
- STOP after creating ONE artifact
If no artifacts are ready (all blocked):
- This shouldn't happen with a valid schema
- Show status and suggest checking for issues
-
After creating an artifact, show progress
(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec status --change "<name>")
Output
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifact was created
- Schema workflow being used
- Current progress (N/M complete)
- What artifacts are now unlocked
- Prompt: "Want to continue? Just ask me to continue or tell me what to do next."
Artifact Creation Guidelines
The artifact types and their purpose depend on the schema. Use the instruction field from the instructions output to understand what to create.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 127 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 58abac2c3bea
opsx-continue is a skill published in the GitHub repository fjpulidop/specrails-core (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,335 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
knowledge-base
Create and maintain a Markdown knowledge base that any AI agent can read, search, and update. Use when the user wants to start a knowledge base, add or update notes, organize docs/notes for an agent or LLM to consume, build an index of notes, or run a cleanup/maintenance pass on an existing MD knowledge base. Triggers…
peer-review
Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating…
scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review…
build-teaql-app
Build or change a TeaQL application in Java, Rust, Go, Swift, Python, C#/.NET, or TypeScript, including Kotlin/JVM applications that consume Java-generated libraries. Mandatory order: first draft and save a complete KSML model, then verify the client and evaluate that saved model, repair it through repeated evaluation…
dd-code-generation
Use pup CLI for immediate Datadog operations or generate code for integration into applications.
taiyi-integration
TaiyiForge 第9阶段 — 闭环归档,CHANGELOG.md。四端通用。.