Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fjpulidop/specrails-core --skill opsx-newgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fjpulidop/specrails-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fjpulidop/specrails-core/opsx-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00854 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00427 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
opsx-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
72% identical to openspec-new-change — 26 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
OpenSpec project root. The
openspec/directory lives in the REPO, not the workspace this skill is driven from. The repo root is${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}(a default-unset env var: when unset it resolves to., i.e. the current directory, so a classic in-repo run is unchanged). Run EVERYopenspeccommand against that root — wrap each invocation as(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec …). Treat${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}as the OpenSpec project root for any path the CLI prints or you read/write.
Start a new change using the experimental artifact-driven approach.
Input: The user's request should include a change name (kebab-case) OR a description of what they want to build.
Steps
-
If no clear input provided, ask what they want to build
Use the AskUserQuestion tool (open-ended, no preset options) to ask:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case name (e.g., "add user authentication" →
add-user-auth).IMPORTANT: Do NOT proceed without understanding what the user wants to build.
-
Determine the workflow schema
Use the default schema (omit
--schema) unless the user explicitly requests a different workflow.Use a different schema only if the user mentions:
- A specific schema name → use
--schema <name> - "show workflows" or "what workflows" → run
openspec schemas --jsonand let them choose
Otherwise: Omit
--schemato use the default. - A specific schema name → use
-
Create the change directory
(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec new change "<name>")Add
--schema <name>only if the user requested a specific workflow. This creates a scaffolded change atopenspec/changes/<name>/with the selected schema. -
Show the artifact status
(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec status --change "<name>")This shows which artifacts need to be created and which are ready (dependencies satisfied).
-
Get instructions for the first artifact The first artifact depends on the schema (e.g.,
proposalfor spec-driven). Check the status output to find the first artifact with status "ready".(cd "${SPECRAILS_REPO_DIR:-.}" && openspec instructions <first-artifact-id> --change "<name>")This outputs the template and context for creating the first artifact.
-
STOP and wait for user direction
Output
After completing the steps, summarize:
- Change name and location
- Schema/workflow being used and its artifact sequence
- Current status (0/N artifacts complete)
- The template for the first artifact
- Prompt: "Ready to create the first artifact? Just describe what this change is about and I'll draft it, or ask me to continue."
Guardrails
- Do NOT create any artifacts yet - just show the instructions
- Do NOT advance beyond showing the first artifact template
- If the name is invalid (not kebab-case), ask for a valid name
- If a change with that name already exists, suggest continuing that change instead
- Pass --schema if using a non-default workflow
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 83 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 64a20512de4b
opsx-new is a skill published in the GitHub repository fjpulidop/specrails-core (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 854 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 72% identical to openspec-new-change, differing in 26 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-execution-planner
Plan a repository task for execution by a small local coding model, then hand the plan to the local executor over MCP. Inspect the codebase, decompose the work into self-contained sequential prompts, define deterministic eval gates, validate the manifest, and submit it for execution. Never implement the task.
taiyi-evolve
A workflow skill that compares the implemented code with the frozen design after development and testing. It records architecture changes and proposes updates to DESIGN.md, the document describing the intended system structure.
taiyi-diagram-c4
A code-scanning tool that builds C4 architecture documents from a repository. It separates facts observed in the code from conclusions inferred about the design and uses Mermaid diagrams as the source format.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…