Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Flagrare/agent-skills --skill design-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Flagrare/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flagrare/agent-skills/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flagrare/agent-skills/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flagrare/agent-skills/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flagrare/agent-skills/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flagrare/agent-skills/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00356 | $0.02473 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00178 | $0.01236 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00071 | $0.00495 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 132 lines · 356 tokens per session scan A 05035c75c337
design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Flagrare/agent-skills (11 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 356 tokens to every session and 2,473 once invoked, about $0.0018 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
designer
Visual + UX design defaults for new UIs. Material Design 3, dark/light theme, modern type, Behance-grade polish, i18n (en, pt-BR, es), context-aware favicon. No emojis and no em-dashes; use MD3/modern icons instead. Apply when building something new. Project conventions in .claude/conventions/web.md override these…
tanstack-branding
Use when designing or building anything that should look like TanStack — a landing or dashboard page, an OG/social image, a README header, a video or motion graphic, slides, a diagram, merch, or an email. Also use when reviewing whether an existing design is on brand, or when you need exact TanStack colors, fonts…
design
Design any system from scratch into a rigorous System Design Doc. Generic fallback when no topic-specific playbook fits. Sensors and evals gate.
review
Adversarial design review of a System Design Doc. Interrogates the staff questions, finds the cost-explosion and failure risks, returns a verdict. Sensors and evals gate.
options
Present multiple design options as a vertical stack of anchored turns.
qa-test-planner
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.