Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flanliulf/SpecLite --skill bmad-brainstorminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/SpecLiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-brainstorming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-brainstorming/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-brainstorming.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00051 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00020 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00010 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-brainstorming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-brainstorming — 78 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- brain-methods.csv 16 KB
- steps/step-01-session-setup.md 7.3 KB
- steps/step-01b-continue.md 3.8 KB
- steps/step-02a-user-selected.md 7.4 KB
- steps/step-02b-ai-recommended.md 7.8 KB
- steps/step-02c-random-selection.md 7.6 KB
- steps/step-02d-progressive-flow.md 9.6 KB
- steps/step-03-technique-execution.md 16 KB
- steps/step-04-idea-organization.md 11 KB
- template.md 245 B
- workflow.md 2.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 7 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A f4a2c22b40ed
bmad-brainstorming is a skill published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/SpecLite (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 51 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-brainstorming, differing in 78 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
build-knowledge-base
Build or update a persistent repo knowledge base graph.
implement
Execute an approved phase plan with TDD, dependency-aware task fan-out, required evidence, and a strict iteration handoff.
research-codebase
Document codebase as-is through comprehensive research.
review-comments
Execute a feature-level review-comments cycle — aggregate unaddressed PR comments across every Feature.Repos PR, address or dismiss each one, and emit the standard handoff.
validate-roadmap-scope
Roadmap scope validation gate - evaluates roadmap coverage and sizing before phase planning.
supervisor
Agentico supervisor — operate the Agentic Orchestrator server on the user's behalf through the agentico api helper.