Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flanliulf/SpecLite --skill bmad-prfaqgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/SpecLiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-prfaq)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-prfaq"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-prfaq/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-prfaq"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-prfaq.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02221 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01111 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00444 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-prfaq scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-prfaq — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Working Backwards: The PRFAQ Challenge
Overview
This skill forges product concepts through Amazon's Working Backwards methodology — the PRFAQ (Press Release / Frequently Asked Questions). Act as a relentless but constructive product coach who stress-tests every claim, challenges vague thinking, and refuses to let weak ideas pass unchallenged. The user walks in with an idea. They walk out with a battle-hardened concept — or the honest realization they need to go deeper. Both are wins.
The PRFAQ forces customer-first clarity: write the press release announcing the finished product before building it. If you can't write a compelling press release, the product isn't ready. The customer FAQ validates the value proposition from the outside in. The internal FAQ addresses feasibility, risks, and hard trade-offs.
This is hardcore mode. The coaching is direct, the questions are hard, and vague answers get challenged. But when users are stuck, offer concrete suggestions, reframings, and alternatives — tough love, not tough silence. The goal is to strengthen the concept, not to gatekeep it.
Args: Accepts --headless / -H for autonomous first-draft generation from provided context.
Output: A complete PRFAQ document + PRD distillate for downstream pipeline consumption.
Research-grounded. All competitive, market, and feasibility claims in the output must be verified against current real-world data. Proactively research to fill knowledge gaps — the user deserves a PRFAQ informed by today's landscape, not yesterday's assumptions.
Conventions
- Bare paths (e.g.
references/press-release.md) resolve from the skill root. {skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 136 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 9e864f574cc2
bmad-prfaq is a skill published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/SpecLite (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,221 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-prfaq, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
lain
Structural code intelligence for AI coding agents. Use this skill when the user wants to understand how a codebase is organized (modules, call graphs, file dependencies), find where to start reading, trace the impact of a change, find code by meaning, or understand what a symbol does in its full context. Do NOT use…
botpipe-workflow-authoring
Author, review, and improve Botpipe workflows. Use when Codex is asked to create packaged or workspace-local Botpipe workflows, convert codebases into workflows, design provider-heavy producer/verifier steps, write Botpipe prompts/contracts, inspect Botpipe traces, or apply Codex CLI/gpt-5.5 workflow patterns.
intake
The planning front-door. Captures feature ideas and bugs as graded rows in the root INTAKE.md ledger. Use it when the user says "log an idea", "capture a bug", "add to the backlog", "note this down", "track this feature", or invokes /intake. Owns the requirements interview — fleshes out thin ideas, proactively…
pre-merge
The CI gate. Takes a feature branch from "eng says done" to "PR open against staging with green checks". Runs the project's preflight-resolved pipeline from devkit/policy.json components[]: sync → parallel correctness + security waves → coverage → regression tail → security/migration → PRD-consistency → open PR. Emits…
merge
The ship gate — the only skill that merges. --staging merges the feature→staging PR on green CI, deploys, verifies, emits a human test script and stamps the staging sign-off on approval. --production ships the double-confirmed release to main and deploys production. Never self-certifies staging; nothing reaches main…
msg
Root menu for msg skills, plus harness modes. --init is the one-time project bootstrap — use it when the user says "initialise project", "bootstrap repo", "set up the framework", "start a new project", or asks to set up project structure in an empty repo. Other modes: --init-staging (add a staging branch), --update…