Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flanliulf/SpecLite --skill speclite-qa-generate-e2e-testsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/SpecLiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.01131 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00566 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to speclite-domain-research — 16 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
[技能说明] QA Generate E2e Tests 是 Speclite 实施与交付推进工作流 Skill,用于在目标项目中按配置语言、输出语言和工作流步骤完成对应制品或交付动作。
源入口说明:Generate end to end automated tests for existing features. Use when the user says "create qa automated tests for [feature]"
[核心能力]
- Speclite 激活解析:解析三层 customize(base→team→user)、workflow.persistent_facts 和 workflow.on_complete,并通过 speclite resolve config --project-root {project-root} 加载 merged runtime config。
- 源制品发现与上下文加载:按 workflow 规约读取项目制品、配置字段、历史上下文和必要数据文件,保持源流程的输入发现语义。
- 步骤化工作流执行:按 references/workflow-details.md 与拆分后的 reference/step 文件逐步执行,遵守顺序、HALT 条件、菜单等待和状态推进规则。
- 模板化输出生成:使用 assets 中的模板或示例骨架生成文档、报告、规格或交付产物,输出语言服从 document_output_language。
- 质量校验与交接:执行清单、报告、状态同步或 completion handoff,并在退出前解析和执行 workflow.on_complete。
- 迁移一致性约束:当前运行规约只依赖 Speclite runtime,不读取旧运行目录、旧配置文件或旧命令命名空间。
[约定]
裸路径相对于 {skill-root} 解析;{project-root} 是目标项目工作目录;{speclite-runtime-root} 是 {project-root}/_speclite;{skill-name} 是目录 basename。
[激活流程]
触发后先解析 workflow,执行 activation_steps_prepend,加载 persistent_facts,运行 speclite resolve config --project-root {project-root},按 communication_language 与用户沟通,并执行 activation_steps_append。配置文件缺失或关键字段为空时必须 HALT;config.toml.example 只说明字段结构,不作为 runtime fallback。
customization 必须通过 `speclite resolve customization --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root}` 读取 merged JSON;`workflow.on_complete` 使用 `speclite resolve customization --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key workflow.on_complete` 解析。默认 activation 不手写 TOML merge,不使用 `--human` 作为 machine input。
[执行流程]
1. 先完整阅读 references/workflow-details.md;该文件是从源入口转换后的权威工作流规约。随后按需读取 references/workflow-details.md、references/checklist.md。
2. 执行工作流前,确认 {skill-root}、{project-root}、{speclite-runtime-root}、{skill-name} 四个路径变量均已明确。
3. 若 workflow 指向 step 文件,必须一次只读取当前 step,完整执行后再进入下一步;遇到菜单或用户确认点时 HALT 等待。
4. 生成或更新产物时,按源 workflow 的模板、清单、状态字段和输出位置要求执行,不得因为迁移而改变核心需求。
5. 收尾前运行 checklist 或质量检查,解析 workflow.on_complete,并在输出文档末尾追加本 Skill 的生成标注。
[注意事项]
- 名称、目录与 YAML name 字段保持 kebab-case 一致:speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests。
- references/workflow-details.md 和配套 reference 文件均为有效执行规约,不是背景资料。
- 如工作流需要模板,必须从 assets/ 中读取,不得临时省略模板结构。
- 如工作流需要项目配置,必须读取目标项目运行时配置。
- config.toml.example 仅作字段结构参考,不作为 runtime fallback。
- 当前运行规约不得依赖旧运行目录、旧 YAML 配置或旧命令命名空间。
- 输出文档末尾必须追加 *本文档由 speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests Skill 自动生成* 标注。
[生成信息] 本 Skill 由 speclite-skill-creator 自动生成。
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 50 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A c151c358a456
speclite-qa-generate-e2e-tests is a skill published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/SpecLite (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 1,131 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to speclite-domain-research, differing in 16 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
Test Strategy
How to decide what to test at what level — the test pyramid, risk-based coverage, and matching test depth to change risk.
Android Testing
JUnit + Robolectric unit tests, Compose UI tests, screenshot tests, and Espresso for legacy views.
End-to-End Testing
E2E test patterns — what to test, how to structure tests, environment management, avoiding flakiness.
iOS Testing
XCTest unit tests, XCUITest UI tests, snapshot testing, and performance baselines for iOS apps.
Spring Test Pyramid
Unit, integration, slice, and E2E test patterns for Spring Boot applications.
e2e-scaffold
One-shot XCUITest scaffolding for iOS and macOS SwiftUI apps: ranked TIER-1/2/3 stubs, accessibility-identifier suggestions, xcresult runner. Manual only — modifies project files.