Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flanliulf/SpecLite --skill speclite-review-adversarial-generalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/SpecLiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-review-adversarial-general)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-review-adversarial-general/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-review-adversarial-general"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-review-adversarial-general.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.00484 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.00242 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
speclite-review-adversarial-general scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
[技能说明] Speclite Adversarial Review General 用于以高度怀疑的态度审查内容并输出 findings。它关注缺失、风险和不严谨之处，使用精准专业语气，不做人身攻击。
[核心能力] - 内容接收：从用户输入、文件、diff、spec、story 或文档中加载待审查内容。 - 类型识别：识别内容类型并据此调整审查角度。 - 怀疑式分析：默认假设问题存在，找缺失、矛盾、风险和不可验证部分。 - 至少十项发现：正常情况下找出至少十个需要修复或改进的问题。 - 发现报告：以 Markdown list 输出 findings 描述。 - 空输入停止：内容为空或不可读时 HALT 并要求补充。
[执行流程] 1. 从提供输入或上下文加载 content；为空时 HALT。 2. 识别内容类型：diff、branch、uncommitted changes、document、spec、story 或其它 artifact。 3. 使用极度怀疑视角审查，寻找至少十项 fix/improve findings。 4. 输出 Markdown list，只包含 findings 描述。
[注意事项] - 使用精确、专业语气；不要使用人身攻击或粗鲁语言。 - 找缺失，不只找明显错误。 - 如果零 findings，重新分析或要求用户提供审查重点。 - 不要把本 Skill 与 edge-case hunter 混淆；本 Skill 是态度驱动的广义审查。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 33 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A fb711de8c7c1
speclite-review-adversarial-general is a skill published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/SpecLite (4 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 484 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
omc-review
Evaluate finished work for defects, risk, and simplification before it ships.
project-check
Existing project health scan — audits Infrastructure, Security, Quality, and Harness setup. Read-only. Use when: '/project-check', 'project health check', 'project audit', 'what\'s missing', 'analyze my project', 'check setup'. Ends with /project-init and /setup recommendations. NOT for new projects (use…
skeptical-triage
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts. Use when the cost of a false-positive gate block exceeds the cost of 4 extra LLM turns.
anti-patterns
Catalogue of known SDLC anti-patterns that greatcto agents must actively reject when reviewing architecture, plans, code, or post-mortems. Used by architect (pre-impl), pm (planning), senior-dev (impl), l3-support (post-incident).
ase-code-lint
Lint source code for potential code quality problems. Use when the user wants to "lint" or "check" source code.
full-audit
Exhaustive, denominator-driven audit of an entire area (codebase, docs, memory, skills, DB, config). Runs a 6-phase pipeline: scope agreement + prior-map diff -> deterministic sweep (counts/versions/paths/parsing plus cross-index reconciliation) -> parallel read-only content review (citations forced, rule dry-run) ->…