Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins --skill whats-leftgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fledgeling-co/fledgeling-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins/whats-left)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins/whats-left"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins/whats-left/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins/whats-left"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins/whats-left.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00248 | $0.03439 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00099 | $0.01376 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00050 | $0.00688 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00344 |
Grade A, and why
whats-left scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 262 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
What’s left
One page that says where a project actually stands, and one questionnaire inside it that clears everything stopping it — answered in a sitting, exported as JSON, and read back so the answers turn into work.
Running as a Gemini model? Read gemini.md in this directory first, then follow this file with the overrides it names. It converts the Luke-voice pass into a phase that writes copy.json a later phase reads, puts a denominator on each survey scope, and reads back the four field bounds validate_model.py only warns about. Other models skip it.
The failure this exists to prevent
A status report and a list of open questions are usually two documents, and they drift the moment they are written. The report says a feature shipped; the question list asks whether to turn it on. Nobody can see that the second is why the first is a lie.
Two more failures follow from that split, and both are silent:
"Done" gets averaged. A feature that is written, merged and switched off in production is counted alongside one that clients used yesterday. DORA's own measures define deployed from deployment automation and never define done — so a page that reports one number for both is not simplifying, it is discarding the distinction that decides whether anyone should act.
A default gets read as an answer. A pre-selected recommendation is genuinely useful — it is how the reader gets through fourteen decisions in one sitting — but a default nobody looked at, exported as though it were chosen, is a decision attributed to a person who never made it. Every subsequent step inherits that as consent.
This skill produces one page in which neither can happen: the two halves share one link graph, stage is a word rather than a percentage, and the export distinguishes confirmed from the page proposed this and nobody looked.
When it runs
Produce mode — the default. "What's left before this is done", "what are you waiting on me for", "remaining work report", "/whats-left:whats-left".
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/example/items.json 6.4 KB
- assets/example/meta.json 2.4 KB
- assets/example/questions.json 9.8 KB
- gemini.md 21 KB
- references/evidence.md 7.4 KB
- references/reading-the-answers.md 5.2 KB
- references/the-item-model.md 6.3 KB
- references/the-question-model.md 6.7 KB
- scripts/audit_page.mjs 14 KB runs code
- scripts/build_page.py 37 KB runs code
- scripts/lib/harness.mjs 7.0 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_model.py 16 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +4 tokens per session af0e3daec5fe
- 1mo ago First seen · 262 lines · 244 tokens per session scan A 87b544fab1e3
whats-left is a skill published in the GitHub repository fledgeling-co/fledgeling-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 248 tokens to every session and 3,439 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…