Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flonat/flonat-research --skill brief-compliance-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flonat/flonat-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/brief-compliance-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/brief-compliance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/brief-compliance-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/brief-compliance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/brief-compliance-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.01836 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00734 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00367 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
brief-compliance-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 178 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brief Compliance Check
Given a PDF brief and a LaTeX submission, report exactly what is met, missing, or over-limit. Report-only — never modifies files.
Output Path
Per rules/review-artefact-routing.md (auto-loads in research projects (path-scoped to paper-*/ and paper/)):
- Source slug:
brief-compliance-check - Write reports to:
reviews/<paper-slug>/brief-compliance-check/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM>.mdinside the project, where<paper-slug>is the paper directory name (e.g.,paper-jtp,paper-philtech). Path is relative to the research project root, not the Task-Management repo. - Never at project root (
./CRITIC-REPORT.md-style filenames are forbidden — pre-rule layout). - Idempotency: if today's file exists, append a same-day descriptor (
{date}-revision.md,{date}-r2.md,{date}-pre-submission.md) — never overwrite. - Index update: if
reviews/INDEX.mdexists, write a one-line entry under "Latest per source" pointing at the new file. Otherwisereview-recapwill rebuild the index next time it runs. - Infrastructure repos (Task-Management, atlas-workspace, etc.): this section does not apply — the path-scoped rule won't load there.
When to Use
- "Do we meet the requirements of the brief?"
- "Check my submission before I submit"
- Any coursework or report with per-task deliverables and word limits
- Argument:
[brief.pdf] [submission/]or auto-detect from context
Defaults
| Setting | Default |
|---|---|
| Brief path | Prompt if not found automatically |
| Submission dir | CWD or submission/ subdirectory |
| LaTeX file | main.tex in submission dir |
| Word counting | Strips lstlisting, tikzpicture, tabular/tabularx, LaTeX commands |
Protocol
Step 1: Read the Brief
Read the full brief PDF. Extract for each task/section:
- Deliverables — what files or content must be present
- Word limits — any "maximum N words" constraints
- Required files — non-LaTeX files (YAML specs, workflow files, code, etc.)
- Total marks — note the rubric criteria for context
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 178 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 11af32d893d2
brief-compliance-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository flonat/flonat-research (147 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 1,836 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
fin-paper-convert
Compile LaTeX to PDF and convert to target journal format.
template-textbook
Authored textbook and separate draft scaffolding — units, chapters, labs, question banks, deterministic figures, and completion checks.
book-to-skill
Book-to-skill takes technical books, documentation, or other long-form sources and converts them into a skill made of a core definition plus per-chapter files, a glossary, and cheatsheets, so an agent can load only the relevant section instead of the whole document. It supports PDF, EPUB, DOCX, HTML, and several other…
final-review
A workflow for turning course materials into printable final-exam review PDFs. It can organize slides, notes, reading materials, PDFs, images, and scanned documents by chapter, including materials from bilingual courses.
latex-compile
Compile a LaTeX document and fix every error plus aesthetic issue (overfull/underfull boxes, widows, alignment, fonts) for a clean PDF and log. Use this instead of running pdflatex/latexmk manually — it avoids the latexmk stale-log trap and silent grep failures on binary log output, and it reformats rather than…
annotate-paper
Read the open paper and write study annotations into its PDF with zotero-cli - a context box on the title, a four-part summary on the abstract, role-coded abstract highlights, one box per figure panel with a teaching comment, colour-coded body highlights, and a reading note. Use when asked to "annotate", "read and…