Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add floomhq/moto --skill republic-designgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/floomhq/motoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/floomhq/moto/republic-design)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/floomhq/moto/republic-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/floomhq/moto/republic-design/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/floomhq/moto/republic-design"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/floomhq/moto/republic-design.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.02898 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01449 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00580 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00290 |
Grade A, and why
republic-design scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 321 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Republic-Style Design System
Design DNA
Republic's design is built on one principle: financial-grade trust through visual restraint. Every pixel earns investor confidence. No decoration exists without purpose. The platform feels like a Bloomberg terminal dressed in Dieter Rams' philosophy.
The Republic Aesthetic
1. Color Palette (The Trust Stack)
Background: #ffffff (pure white, no off-whites)
Surface: #f9fafb (cards, containers)
Surface elevated: #ffffff + box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.06), 0 1px 2px rgba(0,0,0,0.04)
Border: #e5e7eb (light gray, 1px)
Border emphasis: #d1d5db (slightly darker, for active/hover)
Text primary: #111827 (near-black, high contrast)
Text secondary: #6b7280 (muted gray)
Text tertiary: #9ca3af (captions, timestamps)
Brand green: #10b981 (emerald-500, success, CTA, growth)
Brand green light: #ecfdf5 (emerald-50, subtle badge backgrounds)
Brand green border: #a7f3d0 (emerald-200, badge borders)
Danger: #ef4444 (red-500, sparingly)
Danger light: #fef2f2 (red-50, badge background)
Accent: #3b82f6 (blue-500, links only)
Rules:
- Maximum 2 accent colors per slide (green + one other)
- Never use gradients on backgrounds or cards
- Never use colored left borders on cards (AI slop pattern)
- Dark cards (#111827 or #1a1a1a) used sparingly: max 1 per slide for contrast
- No opacity tricks for backgrounds; use real color values
2. Typography
Primary font: Inter (the fintech standard) Display/headline alternative: DM Sans 600-700 (acceptable substitute) Monospace: JetBrains Mono or SF Mono (code blocks only)
Hero stat: 64-80px, weight 700, tracking -0.02em
Slide headline: 36-44px, weight 600, tracking -0.01em
Card title: 18-22px, weight 600
Body text: 15-16px, weight 400, line-height 1.6
Small label: 12-13px, weight 500, uppercase, tracking 0.05em
Caption: 13-14px, weight 400, color #9ca3af
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 321 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 8d167d829eda
republic-design is a skill published in the GitHub repository floomhq/moto (32 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,898 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ui-review
Retroactive visual audit of UI implementation with 1-4 scoring per dimension.
claude-design-patterns
Engineering rules and reusable patterns for building polished web UI, React artifacts, slide decks, animations, and device mockups — distilled from Anthropic's leaked Claude Design agent system prompt. Use ALONGSIDE the frontend-design skill whenever building or iterating on visual web output: single-file React/HTML…
eval-agents
Audit Claude Code agents defined in .claude/agents/ for description specificity, model tier appropriateness, tools scoping, and system prompt quality. Detects dispatch ambiguity between agents, flags over-permissive tool grants, and checks for human-in-the-loop patterns that break programmatic orchestration. Use when…
land-and-deploy
Merge PR, wait for CI, verify deploy, run canary. The complete landing pipeline.
self-assessment
Interactive skill assessment with personalized learning path generation.
git-ai-archaeology
Analyze AI config evolution in a git repo. Use when mapping AI adoption history, finding when configs were first introduced, charting commit velocity by month, or identifying maturity phases in a project's AI tooling.