Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-plugins --skill qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/florianbruniaux/claude-code-plugins/qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01657 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00663 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 217 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA: Web application testing
Systematically test a web application for bugs, then fix and verify each issue found.
Three tiers of thoroughness. Diff-aware scoping tests what actually changed.
Instructions
Step 1: Scope detection
Determine which pages and features to test.
Diff-aware mode (default): Identify affected routes from the current branch changes.
# Files changed in this branch
git diff --name-only origin/main...HEAD 2>/dev/null || git diff --name-only HEAD~5
# Identify affected routes from changed files
# e.g., changes in src/pages/dashboard/ → test /dashboard
# changes in api/payments/ → test payment flows
Full mode (/qa --full): Test the entire application, starting with critical paths.
Explicit scope (/qa /dashboard /settings): Test specified pages only.
Step 2: Tier selection
| Tier | Flag | Scope | Use when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick | --quick |
Critical + High severity only | Pre-commit fast check |
| Standard | (default) | + Medium severity | Pre-PR review |
| Exhaustive | --exhaustive |
+ Low + cosmetic | Release candidate |
Step 3: Clean working tree
Before testing, ensure you can commit fixes atomically.
git status --short
If there are uncommitted changes: stash them first (git stash), or commit them. Testing on a dirty tree makes it impossible to isolate fix commits.
Step 4: Testing
For each page in scope, systematically check all categories relevant to the selected tier.
How to test
Use whatever browser tooling is available:
- MCP browser tools (if configured): automated navigation and screenshots
- Playwright/Puppeteer (if in the project): scripted test runs
- Manual testing: navigate to the URL, document findings systematically
For each page, cover:
1. Load the page: does it render without errors?
2. Check console: any uncaught errors, failed requests, warnings?
3. Test primary user action: the core thing this page is for
4. Test empty state: what shows when there's no data?
5. Test error state: what happens when an action fails?
6. Test on narrow viewport: does it break below 375px?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 217 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 58ca29355b1f
qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository FlorianBruniaux/claude-code-plugins (43 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,657 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-29.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-e2e-test-specialist
Specialist subagent: Playwright, Cypress, and visual regression testing specialist. Use only when the user explicitly asks for E2E tests, browser test automation, or visual regression testing. Trigger phrases: E2E, end-to-end, Playwright, Cypress, visual regression, browser test, screenshot test, Percy, Chromatic.
full-qa
Generic autonomous QA suite for any project — reads a test plan (markdown file or inline spec), runs all tests using Chrome CDP + iterate cycles, fixes bugs found, and produces a final QA report. Works with any web stack. Trigger with /full-qa [path-to-test-plan.md]. Use before releases, after significant changes, or…
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
browser-testing-with-devtools
Tests in real browsers. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data via Chrome DevTools MCP.
playwright-skill
Complete browser automation with Playwright. Auto-detects dev servers, writes clean test scripts to /tmp. Test pages, fill forms, take screenshots, check responsive design, validate UX, test login flows, check links, automate any browser task. Use when user wants to test websites, automate browser interactions…