Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fmarzochi/EGCnpx agentmods add skills/fmarzochi/egc/e2e-testingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmarzochi/egc/e2e-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmarzochi/egc/e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmarzochi/egc/e2e-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmarzochi/egc/e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmarzochi/egc/e2e-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02093 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00837 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00419 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00209 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to e2e-testing — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
E2E Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Playwright patterns for building stable, fast, and maintainable E2E test suites.
Test File Organization
tests/
├── e2e/
│ ├── auth/
│ │ ├── login.spec.ts
│ │ ├── logout.spec.ts
│ │ └── register.spec.ts
│ ├── features/
│ │ ├── browse.spec.ts
│ │ ├── search.spec.ts
│ │ └── create.spec.ts
│ └── api/
│ └── endpoints.spec.ts
├── fixtures/
│ ├── auth.ts
│ └── data.ts
└── playwright.config.ts
Page Object Model (POM)
import { Page, Locator } from '@playwright/test'
export class ItemsPage {
readonly page: Page
readonly searchInput: Locator
readonly itemCards: Locator
readonly createButton: Locator
constructor(page: Page) {
this.page = page
this.searchInput = page.locator('[data-testid="search-input"]')
this.itemCards = page.locator('[data-testid="item-card"]')
this.createButton = page.locator('[data-testid="create-btn"]')
}
async goto() {
await this.page.goto('/items')
await this.page.waitForLoadState('networkidle')
}
async search(query: string) {
await this.searchInput.fill(query)
await this.page.waitForResponse(resp => resp.url().includes('/api/search'))
await this.page.waitForLoadState('networkidle')
}
async getItemCount() {
return await this.itemCards.count()
}
}
Test Structure
import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
import { ItemsPage } from '../../pages/ItemsPage'
test.describe('Item Search', () => {
let itemsPage: ItemsPage
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
itemsPage = new ItemsPage(page)
await itemsPage.goto()
})
test('should search by keyword', async ({ page }) => {
await itemsPage.search('test')
const count = await itemsPage.getItemCount()
expect(count).toBeGreaterThan(0)
await expect(itemsPage.itemCards.first()).toContainText(/test/i)
await page.screenshot({ path: 'artifacts/search-results.png' })
})
test('should handle no results', async ({ page }) => {
await itemsPage.search('xyznonexistent123')
await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="no-results"]')).toBeVisible()
expect(await itemsPage.getItemCount()).toBe(0)
})
})
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 326 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 4dc1bf3d47e5
e2e-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Fmarzochi/EGC (67 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,093 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to e2e-testing, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
test-runner
For a code change, pick the right test tier by change surface, run apc test with baseline diff, and report only NEW reds vs baseline back to the task's acceptance criterion. Separates envblocked from SUT red so a broken machine never fails the code.
running-livekit-simulations
Runs LiveKit agent simulations and acts on the results. Use when the user says "run my simulations", "regression test my agent before deploying", "run the scenarios", "use lk agent simulate", "did my agent pass", "why did this scenario fail", "run simulations in CI", "test the audio pipeline", "check turn-taking and…
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
qa/test-strategy
A testing strategy based on the testing pyramid: many small unit tests, fewer integration tests, and a smaller set of end-to-end tests that follow real user journeys. It also defines checks for security, boundaries, permissions, and business consistency.