Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fmflurry/settings-opencode --skill test-behavior-not-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmflurry/settings-opencodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmflurry/settings-opencode/test-behavior-not-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmflurry/settings-opencode/test-behavior-not-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmflurry/settings-opencode/test-behavior-not-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmflurry/settings-opencode/test-behavior-not-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmflurry/settings-opencode/test-behavior-not-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00708 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
test-behavior-not-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Behavior, Not Implementation
A test calls the code the way its users do and asserts the result they observe against a literal expected value. A test that asserts which calls the code made, or restates a constant the code contains, does neither.
The check: before you keep a test, ask whether it would still pass if every function it imports returned undefined. If yes, it observes no behavior and cannot fail for a defect. Rewrite the assertion or delete the test.
Why: A test that cannot fail for a defect costs CI time and review attention and catches nothing. A constant pin also fails when someone edits the constant or the prompt it restates, so it prevents that edit.
Five Weak Shapes
- Weak or no assertion. No
expect, or onlytoBeDefined,toBeTruthy,not.toThrow,toBeInstanceOf,toBeGreaterThan(0). - Mock or absence only. Only
toHaveBeenCalled,not.toHaveBeenCalled,toHaveBeenCalledTimes(N),toBeUndefined,toEqual([]),toHaveLength(0),not.toBe(wrongValue). - Self-referential. The expected value comes from the code under test:
expect(f(a)).toBe(f(a)),expect(parsed.url).toBe(buildUrl(...)). - Constant pin. The assertion restates a hand-maintained constant:
expect(LIMITS.maxTools).toBe(8),expect(PROMPT).toContain("You are"). - Fixture asserts fixture. The assertion reads data the test built in
beforeEach, and the subject never runs inside the test body.
The Fix
For mock-only: Assert the payload the mock received or the state after the call, not that it was called.
// WRONG
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
// RIGHT
expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledWith('item-42')
For weak assertion: Call the subject inside the test body with one concrete input and assert the literal output or the observable effect.
// WRONG
expect(slugify("Hello")).toBeDefined()
// RIGHT
expect(slugify("Hello, World!")).toBe("hello-world")
For self-referential: Test the mechanism that reads it with one concrete input instead of calling the same function twice.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 55 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 14c7ba1b73c1
test-behavior-not-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository fmflurry/settings-opencode (171 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 708 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-master
Generates test files, creates mocking strategies, analyzes code coverage, designs test architectures, and produces test plans and defect reports across functional, performance, and security testing disciplines. Use when writing unit tests, integration tests, or E2E tests; creating test strategies or automation…
migrate-xunit-to-xunit-v3
Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest…
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
dart-test
DART Test: unit tests, integration tests, CI validation, and debugging.
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.