Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fmind/dot/production-readinessnpx skills add fmind/dot --skill production-readinessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmind/dotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01254 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00627 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00251 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
production-readiness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Production Readiness
Decide whether the exact candidate can be operated safely; this skill audits and recommends, it does not deploy, migrate, publish, or mutate production unless the user separately authorizes that action, while cloud-run deploys and release publishes.
Workflow
- Resolve the candidate: Record repository state, revision, artifact or image digest, configuration set, environment, dependency and schema versions, and the proposed rollout window; preserve dirty worktrees and never infer exact-head CI from another revision.
- Define working: State critical user journeys, availability and correctness expectations, latency or capacity thresholds, data-loss tolerance, compliance constraints, and explicit stop conditions.
- Inspect the release delta: Review code, dependency, configuration, infrastructure, identity, data, and operational changes; identify one-way doors, coupled releases, hidden manual steps, and compatibility windows.
- Audit security and identity: Check least privilege, authentication and authorization, tenant isolation, secret lifecycle, supply chain, abuse controls, and safe defaults; use threat-model for design risk and secure for repository evidence.
- Audit data and migrations: Verify forward and backward compatibility, rehearsal evidence, lock and duration risk, backup and restore, rollback semantics, data validation, and ownership of irreversible transitions.
- Audit observability: Map each critical journey and failure mode to logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, and actionable alerts, each with an owner, a justified threshold, and a tested runbook.
- Audit capacity and cost: Compare measured demand and headroom with explicit thresholds across saturation, rate limits, concurrency, timeouts, retries, quotas, degraded modes, and cost guardrails, without inventing traffic evidence.
- Audit rollout and recovery: Prefer the smallest reversible exposure; define preflight checks, canary or staged progression, health windows, stop signals, the rollback owner and mechanism (see cloud-run for revision rollback), and post-rollback verification.
- Audit operations: Confirm service ownership, support and escalation paths, dependency contacts, access, runbooks, maintenance burden, disaster recovery, and the first-hours monitoring plan.
- Gate the candidate: Run the full gate (
mise run all); if the tree carries unrelated changes and the gate write-formats, run it in a temporarygit worktreeor fall back tomise run checkandmise run test(see mise). - Verify proportionally: Run only the authorized runtime or staging checks. Failed, stale, unavailable, or differently-scoped evidence remains a gap.
- Place the candidate on the proof ladder: Never collapse these states; a candidate may be ready at one rung and blocked at the next, and every claim records artifact identity, environment, command or observation, timestamp, and source.
source-ready: the intended source and configuration are reviewable.local-green: the repository-owned local checks pass for the candidate.exact-head-CI: required CI passes for the exact immutable revision.runtime-proven: the built artifact works across the authorized runtime boundary.deployed: that artifact is running in the target environment.release-published: the intended audience can obtain the released result (see release).
- Record the gates: For each material gate report its status (pass, fail, blocked, or not run), exact evidence, owner, and smallest next step; lead with blockers, then gaps, verified gates, rollback plan, highest proven rung, and recommendation.
- Decide: Return
GO,GO WITH CHANGES, orNO-GO; authority, schedule pressure, and sunk cost cannot turn a failed hard gate intoGO.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 48 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 2488ac6194e1
production-readiness is a skill published in the GitHub repository fmind/dot (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,254 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
cloud-run
Deploy container services to Google Cloud Run with Artifact Registry, keyless CI identity, Secret Manager, ko, or Dockerfiles.
google-cloud-operations
Operate Google Cloud with gcloud: pin account, configuration, project, and billing context for IAM, APIs, logs, and audits outside deployment.
terraform-stack
Canonical infrastructure-as-code stack — OpenTofu-first with tflint, trivy config scans, terraform-docs, native tests, and GCS state. Use for any Terraform or OpenTofu work.
go-stack
Build Go projects, libraries, CLIs, TUIs, web apps, or ADK agents with the standard package layout and pinned tooling.
python-stack
Build typed Python projects with uv, Ruff, ty, pytest, Litestar, and Typer. Use for packages, CLIs, web apps, tests, typing, or API verification.
chezmoi
Manage chezmoi dotfiles: source naming, Go templates, age-encrypted secrets, and the edit-source then apply/diff workflow.