production-readiness

production-readiness is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from fmind/dot. It costs 46 tokens per session (1,254 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A check of whether a software release can be operated safely in production. It reviews rollout and rollback plans, data changes, monitoring, recovery, support, security, and conditions for stopping.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to make go or no-go decisions, assess migrations and recovery, verify monitoring and identity controls, and define rollout, rollback, and halt conditions.
Why use it?
It exposes operational risks before deployment and keeps local, test, runtime, deployed, and public-release evidence separate.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness
Any agent
npx skills add fmind/dot --skill production-readiness
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmind/dot

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for production-readiness

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dot/production-readiness.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 46 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,254 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00046 $0.01254
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.00627
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00251
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00125

Measured yesterday against content hash 2488ac6194e1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

production-readiness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/production-readiness/SKILL.md · 48 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Production Readiness

Decide whether the exact candidate can be operated safely; this skill audits and recommends, it does not deploy, migrate, publish, or mutate production unless the user separately authorizes that action, while cloud-run deploys and release publishes.

Workflow

  1. Resolve the candidate: Record repository state, revision, artifact or image digest, configuration set, environment, dependency and schema versions, and the proposed rollout window; preserve dirty worktrees and never infer exact-head CI from another revision.
  2. Define working: State critical user journeys, availability and correctness expectations, latency or capacity thresholds, data-loss tolerance, compliance constraints, and explicit stop conditions.
  3. Inspect the release delta: Review code, dependency, configuration, infrastructure, identity, data, and operational changes; identify one-way doors, coupled releases, hidden manual steps, and compatibility windows.
  4. Audit security and identity: Check least privilege, authentication and authorization, tenant isolation, secret lifecycle, supply chain, abuse controls, and safe defaults; use threat-model for design risk and secure for repository evidence.
  5. Audit data and migrations: Verify forward and backward compatibility, rehearsal evidence, lock and duration risk, backup and restore, rollback semantics, data validation, and ownership of irreversible transitions.
  6. Audit observability: Map each critical journey and failure mode to logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, and actionable alerts, each with an owner, a justified threshold, and a tested runbook.
  7. Audit capacity and cost: Compare measured demand and headroom with explicit thresholds across saturation, rate limits, concurrency, timeouts, retries, quotas, degraded modes, and cost guardrails, without inventing traffic evidence.
  8. Audit rollout and recovery: Prefer the smallest reversible exposure; define preflight checks, canary or staged progression, health windows, stop signals, the rollback owner and mechanism (see cloud-run for revision rollback), and post-rollback verification.
  9. Audit operations: Confirm service ownership, support and escalation paths, dependency contacts, access, runbooks, maintenance burden, disaster recovery, and the first-hours monitoring plan.
  10. Gate the candidate: Run the full gate (mise run all); if the tree carries unrelated changes and the gate write-formats, run it in a temporary git worktree or fall back to mise run check and mise run test (see mise).
  11. Verify proportionally: Run only the authorized runtime or staging checks. Failed, stale, unavailable, or differently-scoped evidence remains a gap.
  12. Place the candidate on the proof ladder: Never collapse these states; a candidate may be ready at one rung and blocked at the next, and every claim records artifact identity, environment, command or observation, timestamp, and source.
    • source-ready: the intended source and configuration are reviewable.
    • local-green: the repository-owned local checks pass for the candidate.
    • exact-head-CI: required CI passes for the exact immutable revision.
    • runtime-proven: the built artifact works across the authorized runtime boundary.
    • deployed: that artifact is running in the target environment.
    • release-published: the intended audience can obtain the released result (see release).
  13. Record the gates: For each material gate report its status (pass, fail, blocked, or not run), exact evidence, owner, and smallest next step; lead with blockers, then gaps, verified gates, rollback plan, highest proven rung, and recommendation.
  14. Decide: Return GO, GO WITH CHANGES, or NO-GO; authority, schedule pressure, and sunk cost cannot turn a failed hard gate into GO.

Read the full file on GitHub · 48 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 48 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 2488ac6194e1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

production-readiness is a skill published in the GitHub repository fmind/dot (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,254 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.