Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fmind/dotfiles --skill releasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmind/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dotfiles/release)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dotfiles/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dotfiles/release/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dotfiles/release"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dotfiles/release.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02372 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00949 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00474 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00237 |
Grade A, and why
release scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Release Process
Turn the Conventional Commits since the last tag into a versioned release: a bumped CHANGELOG.md, package manifest updates, an annotated git tag, and a GitHub release. Uses git-cliff (config: dot_config/git-cliff/cliff.toml, deployed to ~/.config/git-cliff/cliff.toml).
Authority Boundaries
- Preparing or reviewing a release does not authorize a commit, tag, push, GitHub release, asset upload, package or image publication, deployment, or announcement. Confirm each requested external mutation before performing it.
- Verification is read-only apart from downloading public assets into a disposable directory. It never creates or edits a release, moves a tag, replaces an asset, rebuilds an artifact, or resigns it.
- If a repository workflow owns release creation, let the pushed tag trigger that workflow and verify its result; do not race it with
gh release create.
Publication Preconditions
- Clean working tree on the default branch (
main), synced withorigin. - History follows conventional-commit — git-cliff groups commits by
typeand skipschore(release)/chore(deps). - The repository's full gate passes on the release tree, normally
mise run all. Before running it, inspect the full gate's task definition and working-tree state. If it invokes whole-tree write-formatters or the tree contains unrelated changes, use an isolated temporary worktree; never reformat unrelated work. - The proposed tag is absent locally and remotely. Stop if either copy exists; never move a published tag.
Workflow
-
Compute the next version from the commit types since the last tag (
feat→ minor,fix/others → patch,!/BREAKING CHANGE→ major):# Resolves the local/global cliff.toml configuration git-cliff --bumped-version # Or explicitly reference the global config if a local one is not present: git-cliff --config ~/.config/git-cliff/cliff.toml --bumped-version -
Update package manifests (if the project doesn't use dynamic/VCS-based versioning) to match the computed version (e.g.,
vX.Y.ZorX.Y.Z):- Python: Bump
versioninpyproject.toml(unless using dynamic versioning viahatch-vcsor similar). - Node.js: Run
npm version --no-git-tag-version X.Y.Zor updatepackage.json. - Go / OpenTofu: Versioned via git tags (no file changes needed).
- Python: Bump
-
Generate the changelog for that version (pass
--configto be explicit):git-cliff --config ~/.config/git-cliff/cliff.toml --bump -o CHANGELOG.md -
Commit the changelog and manifest changes with a release commit (excluded from the changelog by design):
git add CHANGELOG.md # plus the manifest you bumped in step 2, if any (Python: pyproject.toml · Node: package.json · Go/OpenTofu: none) git commit -m "chore(release): vX.Y.Z" -
Record, tag, and push the exact release commit after the authorized release commit:
tag=vX.Y.Z release_sha=$(git rev-parse HEAD) git tag -a "$tag" -m "$tag" "$release_sha" git push --atomic origin main "refs/tags/$tag" -
Publish the GitHub release using only the latest section as notes (write to a temp file to stay shell-agnostic):
release_tmp=$(mktemp -d) git-cliff --config ~/.config/git-cliff/cliff.toml --latest --strip all > "$release_tmp/release-notes.md" gh release create "$tag" --verify-tag --title "$tag" --notes-file "$release_tmp/release-notes.md" -
Print the release URL and the resolved version.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 137 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 142bcf62a235
release is a skill published in the GitHub repository fmind/dotfiles (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,372 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
dot-cli
Run dot: doctor, login/setup, repo status/pull, trust, secret run, cache/prune, disk space, orphans, context budgets, archives.
git-delivery
Stage, commit, push, and release scoped changes with Conventional Commits; fix hook failures.
resolve-conflicts
Resolve Git merge or rebase conflicts by both sides' intent; verify the result.
github-repository
Set GitHub repo description, topics, merge policy, and security settings.
github-pull-request
Open, update, and verify GitHub pull requests.
sync-release
Owns release-pipeline conventions: sr.yaml schema, the sr CLI verbs (init/plan/prepare/ release) and urmzd/sr action, typed publishers (cargo/npm/pypi/docker/go/custom), monorepo workspace discovery, versionfiles/stagefiles mapping, and post-release patterns. Language-specific build targets live in scaffold-rust…