Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fo0/clawstash/gitnexus-reviewnpx skills add fo0/clawstash --skill gitnexus-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fo0/clawstashWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fo0/clawstash/gitnexus-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fo0/clawstash/gitnexus-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fo0/clawstash/gitnexus-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00578 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00289 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00116 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
gitnexus-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Review this PR"
- "What did my changes affect?"
- "Check if this change is safe"
- "Verify no regressions"
- During a review run via the
reviewskill (on demand — reviews are never auto-run)
Workflow
gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "all"})-> See all changed files and affected processes- For each changed symbol:
gitnexus_impact({target, direction: "upstream"})-> Find dependents gitnexus_context({name: "changedSymbol"})-> Verify all callers are updated- Cross-reference affected processes with test coverage
If the index is reported stale, rebuilding is not routine — run
npx gitnexus analyze --skip-agents-mdonly if the task needs a fresh index, thengit status+git checkout --any tracked file it touched (read-only policy).
Review Checklist
Step 1: Scope Assessment
gitnexus_detect_changes({scope: "all"})
-> Changed: N files, M symbols
-> Affected processes: [list]
-> Risk: LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH
Step 2: Impact Verification (for each high-risk change)
gitnexus_impact({target: "changedFunction", direction: "upstream"})
-> Verify all upstream callers handle the change correctly
-> Check if return types, parameters, or behavior contracts changed
Step 3: Dependency Check
gitnexus_context({name: "changedFunction"})
-> Verify outgoing dependencies still valid
-> Check if new dependencies were introduced
Step 4: Cross-cutting Concerns
gitnexus_cypher({query: "MATCH (f:Function)-[:CodeRelation]->(changed:Function {name: 'X'}) WHERE f.filePath CONTAINS 'test' RETURN f"})
-> Verify test coverage exists for affected code
Risk Assessment
| Risk Level | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| LOW | <=3 files, 1 process affected | Standard review |
| MEDIUM | 4-10 files, 2-3 processes | Review + run affected process tests |
| HIGH | >10 files, >3 processes, or cross-area changes | Full review + all tests + manual verification |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 66 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A da2b12a334fc
gitnexus-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fo0/clawstash (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 578 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
@elad12390/web-research-assistant
Comprehensive MCP server for web research with 14 tools: SearXNG + Exa AI search, URL crawling, stealth scraping (Cloudflare bypass), package registry lookup (npm/PyPI/crates), GitHub stats, changelog fetching, tech comparison, error translation, API docs discovery, stock image search, and service health. Trigger…
business-model-validator
Use when a prospect, new customer, or existing operator wants to know whether Zooza fits their business, or which Zooza features map to how they operate. No Zooza account required — works as a pure knowledge interview.
spotify-mcp-doctor
Diagnose and repair NovaLux12/spotify-mcp-server failures — auth, permissions, devices, rate limits, OpenClaw wiring. Use when Spotify tool calls fail or setup stalls.
delegacion-local
Regla y catálogo para delegar pasos mecánicos (resumir, clasificar, extraer, boilerplate, mensaje de commit desde un diff, traducir texto o archivo, resumir salida de lint/tests/CI, explicar código, describir una imagen, verificar si el backend local está disponible) a modelos locales vía las tools local del MCP…
class-management
Use when the user wants to create a new class, group, or course in Zooza — e.g. "set up a Monday yoga class", "add a new group", "schedule a course". Guides through programme selection, venue, trainer, session pattern, and commits.
feedback-nudge
Use when the user wants to report a bug, request a feature, or send feedback to the Zooza engineering team. Also offer proactively after a successful commit operation (max once per week).