Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fold-run/fold. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fold-run/fold/main/.claude/skills/observability/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fold-run/foldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fold-run/fold/observability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fold-run/fold/observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fold-run/fold/observability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fold-run/fold/observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fold-run/fold/observability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.01388 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00555 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
observability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Changing what fold reports about itself
Three surfaces, one rule each, and only one of them has a test.
| Surface | Declared in | Held in lockstep by |
|---|---|---|
| Prometheus metrics | gateway/metrics.go |
gateway/observability_pack_test.go, both directions |
| Trace attributes | gateway/otel.go |
nothing — docs/operations.md "Tracing" is the record |
| Audit event fields | audit/audit.go |
nothing — docs/operations.md "Audit events" is the record |
Metrics: the pack is checked both ways
observability_pack_test.go compares the names in metrics.go against the
three files that query them:
deploy/helm/fold/dashboards/fold-overview.jsondeploy/helm/fold/templates/prometheusrule.yaml(prometheus-operator)deploy/observability/alerts.yml(plain Prometheus, the compose stack)
Forward: every fold_* the pack references must be declared. A query
naming a metric that does not exist draws an empty panel and arms an alert
that can never fire — the two failure modes that look exactly like health.
Backward: every declared metric must appear somewhere in the pack, so a
new one forces the question "does this belong on the dashboard" instead of
shipping unobserved. metricNamesUnexercised is the escape hatch and is
currently empty; adding to it should cost a reason in the diff.
And TestBothRuleFilesCarryTheSameAlerts — the two rule files are the same
alerts for two deployment shapes. Change one, change the other.
Two traps in how the check reads the code
- It extracts quoted string literals matching
"fold_[a-z_]+"frommetrics.goonly. A name built by concatenation, or declared in another file, is invisible to the test — it will pass while shipping a metric nothing watches. - Histogram series are matched after stripping
_bucket/_sum/_count, so queryfold_request_duration_seconds_bucketfreely; the base name is what must be declared.
It reads the source rather than scraping a live registry on purpose: a
CounterVec with no observations exposes nothing, so a scrape would
under-report exactly the metrics that have never fired.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 117 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A f3cb97686807
observability is a skill published in the GitHub repository fold-run/fold (1 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 1,388 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
observability compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| observabilityfold-run/fold | Skill | 1 | 12d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 76 | Claude Code |
| migrate-goldmark-extension-v1-to-v2yuin/goldmark | Skill | 5.1k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| migrate-goldmark-app-v1-to-v2yuin/goldmark | Skill | 5.1k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| use-modern-goJetBrains/go-modern-guidelines | Skill | 3.9k | 22d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| jwx-guide-v4lestrrat-go/jwx | Skill | 2.4k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 61 | Claude Code |
| goericrisco/rsc-harness | Skill | 503 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 86 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gographozgurcd/gograph | Skill | 231 | yesterday | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code |