Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fold-run/fold. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fold-run/fold/main/.claude/skills/roadmap/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fold-run/foldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fold-run/fold/roadmap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fold-run/fold/roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fold-run/fold/roadmap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fold-run/fold/roadmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fold-run/fold/roadmap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.01122 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00449 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
roadmap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 107 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
The gap list and the roadmap
These are not marketing documents. gateway/era_test.go and
gateway/listen_test.go fail with messages that point the reader at
them, and CLAUDE.md's fourth rule makes updating them a merge condition.
A gap here is load-bearing text.
Two surfaces, different jobs:
- README "Not implemented" — what fold does not do today, with the reason. Read by someone evaluating fold, so each entry has to survive a skeptic: name the gap, name the cause (structural, waiting on someone else, or deliberate), and say what would close it.
- docs/roadmap.md — what fold intends, in three horizons plus "Non-goals" and "Deprecations on the clock". No dates, deliberately.
Every "Not implemented" entry has a roadmap counterpart. The README says what is missing; the roadmap says whether it is coming.
The four vetoes
docs/roadmap.md "How to read this" names what kills an item regardless of
demand:
- the v1 compatibility contract and the frozen defaults,
- the invisibility rule,
- the added-latency gate,
- audit as the single exit door.
A feature that requires breaking one does not get built — it gets a non-goal entry with the reasoning written down. That conversion is the main judgement this skill exists for. Content inspection is the worked example: it is a non-goal because inspecting bodies means buffering and rewriting, which conflicts with (2) and (3) — and the entry still offers the fold-shaped answer (the decision hook) rather than stopping at "no".
A non-goal entry that only says no is incomplete. Say what the veto was and what someone with that need should do instead.
Closing a gap
When a change closes one, the same PR does all of it:
- Remove or narrow the README "Not implemented" entry — narrowing is common and honest: three consequences, one addressed, two named.
- Update the roadmap counterpart (move it out of its horizon, or strike it).
- Find the canary. If the gap was waiting on someone else, there is probably a test that fails when the wait ends. Flip or delete it, and never "fix" one by loosening the assertion.
- CHANGELOG entry if it ships in a release.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 107 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A e2c036d26d8e
roadmap is a skill published in the GitHub repository fold-run/fold (1 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,122 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
roadmap compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| roadmapfold-run/fold | Skill | 1 | 12d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 75 | Claude Code |
| migrate-goldmark-extension-v1-to-v2yuin/goldmark | Skill | 5.1k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| use-modern-goJetBrains/go-modern-guidelines | Skill | 3.9k | 22d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| pi-loop-forensicsdimetron/pi-go | Skill | 222 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 65 | Claude Code, Codex |
| nightly-session-watchdimetron/pi-go | Skill | 222 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 78 | Claude Code, Codex |
| tui-render-debugdimetron/pi-go | Skill | 222 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 33 | Claude Code, Codex |
| memory-minedimetron/pi-go | Skill | 222 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |