Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/refactornpx skills add forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2 --skill refactorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/refactor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00502 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00251 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
対象: $ARGUMENTS
適用していいリファクタパターン
- 関数の抽出: 長い関数の一部を切り出して別関数にする
- 変数の改名: 命名を意図に合わせる (
a→userIndex) - 重複の除去: 同じロジックを共通関数に集約
- 条件式の簡略化: ネスト深い
ifを早期リターンに、複雑な条件を変数に切り出す - マジックナンバー定数化:
0.08をTAX_RATEに、60をSECONDS_PER_MINUTEに - デッドコード削除: 呼び出されていない関数・到達しないコードの除去
厳守ルール
- 振る舞いを変える変更（バグ修正、機能追加、API シグネチャ変更）は行わない
- 1リファクタ = 1コミット粒度。複数パターンを混ぜない
- 各リファクタ後にテストを実行し、全テストが通ったことを確認してから次へ
進め方
- 対象を読み、適用候補のリファクタパターンを5件まで列挙
- パターン1つに絞ってユーザーに確認
- リファクタを実行 → テスト実行 → 結果報告
- 次のパターンに進むか、ここで完了かをユーザーに確認
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 29 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A eafbf7cb4776
refactor is a skill published in the GitHub repository forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2 (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 502 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…