Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add forger-labs-hq/researchforge --skill researchforge-papersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forger-labs-hq/researchforgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-papers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-papers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-papers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-papers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forger-labs-hq/researchforge/researchforge-papers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00353 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00177 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
researchforge-papers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Find and review papers
Search
The engine generates queries from the objective (and repository scan, if any), retrieves candidates from arXiv, deduplicates, ranks, and stores them:
researchforge research search --json
To steer the search, pass explicit arXiv queries (repeatable):
researchforge research search -q "all:mixture of experts routing" --json
Report how many papers were retrieved, deduplicated, and stored — from the JSON, not from memory.
Review
researchforge papers list --json
researchforge papers show <paper-id> --json
When discussing a paper, use only its stored metadata (title, authors, abstract, ranking signals). ResearchForge stores metadata and abstracts, not full texts — say so if the user asks for details an abstract cannot support.
Next step after papers exist: the researchforge-landscape skill synthesizes them into research directions.
Rules
- The Python engine is the boundary: never work around a validation error, a protected path, or an approval gate — fix the artifact or ask the user.
- Approvals belong to the user: never pass
--yesor type a confirmation unless the user explicitly approved that step in this conversation. - Ground every summary in stored data: quote only numbers returned by
--jsonoutput or files under.researchforge/— never invent metrics.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 48 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 5bf748ffac00
researchforge-papers is a skill published in the GitHub repository forger-labs-hq/researchforge (8 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 353 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
flux-analyzer
Analyse FBA flux distributions to extract biological insights. Covers gene essentiality, phenotypic phase planes, flux sampling, pathway-level aggregation, secretion product prediction, and production of publication- quality figures.
statistical-method-design
Design statistical methods, baselines, diagnostics, variants, and ablations that directly address a formal problem formulation.
experimental-design
Best practices for designing reproducible ML experiments. Use when planning ablations, baselines, or controlled experiments.
ads-linkedin
Audit LinkedIn Ads measurement, Insight Tag and conversions, professional audiences, lead generation, ABM, creative, bidding, budgets, pacing, automation, and policy. Use for LinkedIn Ads, Campaign Manager, Insight Tag, Lead Gen Forms, Thought Leader Ads, ABM campaigns, or B2B paid media.
ads-launch
Draft or explicitly apply a paid-ad campaign launch through Claude Ads capability-gated adapters. Use for campaign creation, launch plans, publishing ads, activating campaigns, uploading creative, or requests to push a campaign live.
bun-test-mocking
Use for mock functions in Bun tests, spyOn, mock.module, implementations, and test doubles.