requesting-code-review

requesting-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from ForgeyClap/claude-forge. It costs 22 tokens per session (839 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of requesting-code-review, MIT.

A procedure for sending completed work to a code reviewer agent before it is merged. The reviewer compares the changes with the requirements and reports issues to fix or discuss.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a task or major feature, before merging, when stuck, before refactoring, or after fixing a complex bug.
Why use it?
It catches defects and missed requirements before they spread into later work or reach the main branch.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/. Also seen: mentions subagents; positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it after a task or major feature, before merging, when stuck, before refactoring, or after fixing a complex bug.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ForgeyClap/claude-forge --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ForgeyClap/claude-forge

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for requesting-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for requesting-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/requesting-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 839 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 88% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00839
Opus 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00336
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00168
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00084

Measured 21d ago against content hash c0c06707abf5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

88% identical to requesting-code-review — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Requesting Code Review

Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history.

Core principle: Review early, review often.

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

  • After each task in subagent-driven development
  • After completing major feature
  • Before merge to main

Optional but valuable:

  • When stuck (fresh perspective)
  • Before refactoring (baseline check)
  • After fixing complex bug

How to Request

1. Get git SHAs:

BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)  # or: git merge-base origin/main HEAD
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

2. Dispatch code reviewer subagent:

Dispatch a general-purpose subagent, filling the template at code-reviewer.md

Placeholders:

  • {DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary of what you built
  • {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do
  • {BASE_SHA} - Starting commit
  • {HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit

3. Act on feedback:

  • Fix Critical issues immediately
  • Fix Important issues before proceeding
  • Note Minor issues for later
  • Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)

Example

[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]

You: Let me request code review before proceeding.

BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

[Dispatch code reviewer subagent]
  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types
  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from docs/superpowers/plans/deployment-plan.md
  BASE_SHA: a7981ec
  HEAD_SHA: 3df7661

[Subagent returns]:
  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
  Issues:
    Important: Missing progress indicators
    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
  Assessment: Ready to proceed

You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 21d ago First seen · 106 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A c0c06707abf5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ForgeyClap/claude-forge (2 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 839 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

validate

Use when operating as the Fabrik Validate stage agent. This skill guides final validation of an implementation, verifying requirements are met, tests pass, and the PR is ready to merge.

handarbeit/fabrik · 36 tokens

review

Use when operating as the Fabrik Review stage agent. This skill guides code review of an implementation, finding and fixing issues, and ensuring the PR is ready for human review.

handarbeit/fabrik · 35 tokens

review-comment

Use when operating as the Fabrik Review comment reviewer. This skill guides applying user decisions on review findings — fixing issues, dismissing false positives, or deferring items — then committing and pushing without signaling stage completion.

handarbeit/fabrik · 43 tokens

pr-comments

Triage unresolved review threads on an open PR: per thread either agree (fix, verify, push, reply, resolve) or disagree (justify with a version-matched citation). Use when asked about PR comments or told to reply and resolve.

waqas1412/claude-harness · 52 tokens

orchestrate

Run the review lenses over a change: pick the ones the change touches, read or dispatch each, gate go/no-go on cited evidence. Use when asked for our lenses, or to plan or verify a non-trivial change.

waqas1412/claude-harness · 50 tokens

pr

Write or draft a minimal GitHub PR title and body: a linked tracker close line plus 3 to 6 one-line bullets, nothing else. Use when running gh pr create / gh pr edit or when asked for a PR description.

waqas1412/claude-harness · 50 tokens