docs-review

docs-review is a skill for Claude Code from foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills. It costs 32 tokens per session (1,531 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A review guide for checking documentation changes against Metabase's writing style rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
It reviews local files, diffs, or GitHub pull requests containing Markdown documentation and reports numbered issues when needed.
Why use it?
It helps catch meaningful problems in tone, clarity, and reader usefulness before documentation is approved.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Good fit It reviews local files, diffs, or GitHub pull requests containing Markdown documentation and reports numbered issues when needed.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review
About the project

Vibe-Skills is a collection and routing system that helps AI agents discover, select, and coordinate specialized skills for completing tasks. It is intended for agents that need to organize workflows across many installed capabilities. The catalogue entries are skills and an agent belonging to this system.

foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills · 3,252 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills --skill docs-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for docs-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for docs-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/docs-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,531 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.01531
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00766
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00306
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00153

Measured 13d ago against content hash 5c0ef52be515, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

docs-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

bundled/skills/docs-review/SKILL.md · 164 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Documentation Review Skill

@./../_shared/metabase-style-guide.md

Review mode detection

IMPORTANT: Before starting the review, determine which mode to use:

  1. PR review mode: If the mcp__github__create_pending_pull_request_review tool is available, you are reviewing a GitHub PR

    • Use the pending review workflow to post all issues as one cohesive review
    • Follow the workflow steps in "PR review mode format" below
  2. Local review mode: If the MCP tool is NOT available, output issues in the conversation

    • Format all issues in a numbered markdown list (as described in "Feedback format" below)

Review process

  1. Detect review mode - Check if mcp__github__create_pending_pull_request_review is available
  2. Read the changes through once to understand intent
  3. Check all issues that violate style guide or significantly impact readability
  4. Only flag issues worth mentioning - if it won't make a material difference to the reader, skip it
  5. REQUIRED: Number ALL feedback sequentially - Start from Issue 1 and increment for each issue found

Review checklist

Run through the diff looking for these issues:

Tone and voice:

  • Formal/corporate language ("utilize" not "use", "offerings", etc.)
  • "Users" instead of "people" or "companies"
  • Excessive exclamation points or overly peppy tone
  • Telling readers something is cool instead of showing them

Structure and clarity:

  • Important information buried instead of leading
  • Verbose text that adds little value
  • Paragraphs without clear purpose
  • Vague headings that don't convey the point
  • Instructions explain "why" before telling "what to do"
  • Tasks described as "easy" or "simple"

Links and references:

  • Linking the word "here" instead of descriptive text
  • Links in headings (unless entire heading is a link)

Formatting:

  • Ampersands as "and" substitute (except proper nouns)
  • Inconsistent list formatting

Code and examples:

Read the full file on GitHub · 164 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 164 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 5c0ef52be515

Subscribe to this mod's changes

docs-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository foryourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-Skills (3,252 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,531 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.