Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace --skill legal-contract-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/legal-contract-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/legal-contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/legal-contract-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/legal-contract-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/legal-contract-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01852 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00741 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00370 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00185 |
Grade A, and why
legal-contract-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 171 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: legal-contract-review description: Review contracts for risk, extract key clauses, triage NDAs, and score compliance exposure. Use when evaluating vendor agreements, reviewing customer contracts, assessing NDA terms, or performing contract due diligence. tags: [legal, contracts, compliance, risk-analysis]
Legal Contract Review
Structured contract analysis framework for extracting key terms, scoring risk, triaging NDAs, and identifying compliance exposure. Provides repeatable, evidence-based contract review — not legal advice.
Disclaimer: This skill provides structured analysis patterns and checklists. All output should be reviewed by qualified legal counsel before making binding decisions.
Use this skill when
- Reviewing vendor, customer, or partner agreements for risk
- Triaging NDAs (mutual or unilateral) for quick risk classification
- Extracting key commercial terms into a structured summary
- Scoring compliance exposure across regulatory dimensions
- Preparing contract summaries for executive or board review
- Conducting due diligence on a portfolio of contracts
Do not use this skill when
- You need binding legal opinions (consult qualified counsel)
- Drafting new contracts from scratch (use legal templates instead)
- Reviewing highly regulated instruments (securities, insurance policies) requiring specialized expertise
- The contract is in a language you cannot fully parse
Instructions
- Identify contract type — classify as vendor, customer, partnership, NDA, employment, or licensing agreement.
- Run the 10-Point Checklist — extract each element into the Clause Extraction Template.
- Score compliance risk — apply the Compliance Risk Score across all applicable dimensions.
- Check Red Flags — scan for the 8 critical red flag patterns.
- For NDAs — apply the NDA Triage Matrix for rapid classification.
- Generate output — produce a Contract Summary Brief with risk heat map.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 171 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e2f2a045fc5b
legal-contract-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace (37 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,852 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-check
Full-stack legal, privacy, and compliance audit engine for web applications and SaaS platforms. Use this skill when the user wants to audit a codebase for legal exposure, privacy risks, GDPR/CCPA compliance gaps, missing consent flows, unsafe data practices, cookie policy issues, payment/auth compliance, AI disclosure…
r-conventions
R code conventions covering R 4.1+, tidyverse/base style, styler/lintr, roxygen2, testthat, error handling, input validation, C/C++/Rust interop, and CRAN compliance. Load when writing or reviewing R code.
orca-custom-framework
Creates custom compliance frameworks from existing frameworks, alert lists, or security themes — organizes controls into sections, maps alerts, and pushes the framework to Orca. Suggests creating custom discovery alerts for gaps not covered by existing rules. Use when user asks to create, build, or generate a custom…
lov-domain-cutover
A workflow for putting a mainland-China website online after its ICP filing is approved. It verifies the deployment, DNS, HTTPS certificate, domain response, ICP footer, and handling of the old domain.
lov-filing-monitor
A recurring checker for website filing status on official Chinese government or service-provider pages. It compares the latest status with the previous check and keeps a record.
lov-icp-filing
A workflow for submitting and tracking an ICP filing, which is the registration required for many websites operating in mainland China. It follows the application through provider checks, identity and domain verification, text-message confirmation, and government approval.