Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fredoliveira/agents --skill index-atomic-notesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fredoliveira/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fredoliveira/agents/index-atomic-notes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fredoliveira/agents/index-atomic-notes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fredoliveira/agents/index-atomic-notes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fredoliveira/agents/index-atomic-notes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fredoliveira/agents/index-atomic-notes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00140 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
index-atomic-notes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Atomic note indexer
Purpose
Integrate a new atomic note into the knowledge graph by:
- Filing it under relevant topic maps of content (MOCs)
- Discovering and creating meaningful connections to other atomic notes
Instructions
1. Understand existing topics
Browse the Topics/ folder to understand what maps of content already exist and what subjects they cover.
2. File the note under relevant topics
If the note fits existing topics:
- Add a link to the atomic note in the appropriate section of each relevant MOC
- Add those topics to the note's frontmatter
topicsproperty
If no suitable topic exists:
- Ask the user whether to create a new topic or leave the note unindexed for now
3. Find connections to other atomic notes
- Start by exploring notes already linked from the relevant topics
- Identify notes that relate meaningfully to the new one
- Always ask the user before modifying other notes
Preserving Atomicity When Cross-Linking
Each atomic note should contain a single, focused insight. Cross-links must enhance without diluting.
Principles
| Do | Don't |
|---|---|
| Add brief links that provide nuance | Add explanatory text that expands the scope |
| Suggest connections to the user | Modify notes without permission |
| Preserve the original focus | Turn notes into discussion hubs |
Self-check before adding a link
- Does the note title still capture the complete insight?
- Could a reader understand the core idea from the title and first paragraph alone?
- Am I changing what this note is fundamentally about?
If the answer to the last question is "yes", suggest the link to the user instead of adding it.
Examples
Good cross-link — adds nuance to existing insight:
Original: "Large language models understand concepts" Addition: "However, [[Performance depends on verifiability]], which means they show stronger capabilities on verifiable tasks."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 7f420e87bb61
index-atomic-notes is a skill published in the GitHub repository fredoliveira/agents (25 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 700 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
save-session
Save a dated Obsidian recap of the current agent session, including outcomes, decisions, useful examples, changed files, and deferred work.
personal-ip-knowledge-builder
A tool for turning interviews, chats, résumés, public content, business materials, case studies, and existing documents into a long-term personal knowledge base for an AI-assisted public profile.
atomic-note-to-moc
Integrate an atomic note with the vault's MOC system and related notes. Use after creating or saving an atomic note that needs folder or tag classification, anchor consideration, or cross-links.
create-note
Create an Obsidian Inbox capture, a human-owned Atomic Note draft, or approved reusable knowledge from a conversation. Use for "capture this", "create a note", "write this in my own words", "save this explanation", or promoting material from existing notes. Use ingest for external sources and save-session for a…
memory-recall
Search the Obsidian vault for prior knowledge, decisions, and connections. Use for "do I have notes on", "what did I write or decide", "find in my vault", "what do I know about", or requests to connect topics using personal knowledge.
skill-authoring
Create, revise, or remove reusable procedural and interactive skills; use memorystore for facts and preferences.