Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fredrikaverpil/dotfiles --skill pr-stylegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fredrikaverpil/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fredrikaverpil/dotfiles/pr-style)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fredrikaverpil/dotfiles/pr-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fredrikaverpil/dotfiles/pr-style/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fredrikaverpil/dotfiles/pr-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fredrikaverpil/dotfiles/pr-style.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00800 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00320 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
pr-style scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pull Request Style
Conventions for PR titles and descriptions. These apply no matter how the PR
is created (gh CLI, GitHub MCP tools, API).
General
- Always create draft PRs.
- Assign the PR to me (the author), not to Claude or a bot identity.
- Keep PR titles, descriptions, and comments concise and clear.
- Include only useful information. Remove redundancy and over-explanation.
- Prefer explicitness and clarity over verbosity.
- Express Why/What/Notes content as concise, to-the-point bullet lists. Avoid prose paragraphs.
- All references to functions, libraries, projects, products must be linked.
- Include a small, illustrative code snippet whenever it conveys the change faster than prose. This is desired for PRs in general, and especially for bug fixes: a minimal example of the triggering case (and what went wrong) makes the problem concrete for reviewers. Keep it short — just enough to convey the point, not a full reproduction.
- The PR text describes the change only: no "Generated with Claude Code" lines, no session links or model names.
- In Claude cloud sandbox sessions, the platform appends a "Generated by Claude Code" footer to the PR body at creation time, outside your control. After creating a PR, always read it back and, if a footer was appended, update the PR body to remove it (updates are not re-footered). Also verify angle-bracket placeholders survived; the platform strips them even inside code spans.
PR Title Format
Write the title as if the whole PR was squashed into a single commit using conventional commits. Use imperative mood (e.g., "Add feature" not "Added feature"). Keep it concise and descriptive.
PR Body Format
## Why?
[Explain the motivation for this change. What problem does it solve?]
## What?
[Describe what was changed. List the key modifications.]
## Notes
[Optional. Additional context, testing notes, or follow-up items.]
Rules:
## Why?- Required. Explain motivation and problem being solved## What?- Required. Describe the changes made## Notes- Optional. Omit entirely if no notes are needed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -8 lines · -8 tokens per session ce14301a12a2
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A f0083b15f5e4
pr-style is a skill published in the GitHub repository fredrikaverpil/dotfiles (259 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 800 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Use when the user wants to create a new pull request, update an existing PR's body, open a draft PR, or preview a PR body locally before pushing.
receiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation.
requesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements.
standards
Check current work against the shared user-level coding standards.
pr-grooming
Use when the user wants to groom, triage, or clean up the open pull requests of a repo: "groom the PRs", "review the open PRs", "which drafts are stale", "close old draft PRs", "rebase the dependabot PRs", "are the open PRs still mergeable", "refresh that old bugfix PR", or a periodic PR review — even when they do not…
explain-changes
Explain how the code on the current branch works, as an HTML page opened in the browser, written so someone can understand the change and review it. Use when asked to explain a branch, explain these changes, walk me through this code, help me review this, or explain what an agent just did. Most useful when someone…