identify-key-failures

Identify Key Failures

Use this skill to turn many failed attempts into reusable guidance for the next planning round.

Input Contract

Read:

• the failed decomposition plans
• direct-proving stuck points
• existing failed_paths
• relevant counterexamples and toy_examples

Procedure

1. Gather the reports from all failed plans. If only direct proving has run so far, work directly from the direct-proving failures.
2. List the key stuck points for each plan.
3. Identify common points across those failures:
   • recurring obstructions or counterexamples
   • decomposition patterns that keep breaking
   • search gaps or missing background facts
4. Summarize what the failures suggest for the next generation of decomposition plans.
5. When all current decomposition plans have failed and no pattern is leading anywhere, publish the synthesized dead_end (below): the main agent reasons or launches exploratory subagents, then delivers a fresh direction as master_guidance.
6. Save the synthesized failure knowledge to failed_paths so later planning skills can use it.
7. After recording the failure synthesis, return control to $propose-subgoal-decomposition-plans.

Output Contract

Publish the failure synthesis to global memory with gm_add (kind dead_end): claim = the common stuck points, evidence = the per-plan failures, so siblings skip these paths. Carry these fields:

{
  "record_type": "key_failures_summary",
  "failed_plan_ids": ["..."],
  "plan_failures": [
    {
      "plan_id": "...",
      "stuck_points": ["..."]
    }
  ],
  "common_failures": ["..."],
  "implications_for_next_plans": ["..."]
}

Also note in your local memory (events) that a new planning round is needed.

Tools

• gm_add (publish the dead_end synthesis)
• gm_search (gather the failed plans and stuck points across the swarm)

Failure Logging

If the reports are too weak to identify meaningful common failures, note in local memory (events) event_type="key_failures_inconclusive" and state what information is still missing.