Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to friedbotstudio/baseline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/friedbotstudio/baseline/main/.claude/skills/scout/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/friedbotstudio/baselineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/scout)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/scout/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/scout"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/scout.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.01796 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00036 | $0.00718 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00359 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00180 |
Grade A, and why
scout scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are mapping the slice of the codebase that matters for the current task — no more, no less. The scout report is consumed downstream by /research and /spec.
Prereqs
.claude/state/workflow.jsonexists.intakeis incompletedOR inexceptions. If neither, stop and direct the user to invokeintake.
Inputs
- The intake document at
docs/intake/<slug>.md— read Problem and Goal first; they define scope. - The BRD at
docs/brd/<slug>.mdif present — In/Out scope lists. - The codebase at the project root.
- Optional argument: a specific path to scope the scout.
If no intake exists (ad-hoc invocation), fall back to the parent task description and note in the report that the scout ran without a structured intake.
Method
-
Reconcile against the workspace corpus before discovering anything. This step is gated — check the flag FIRST:
node .claude/skills/workspace/cli.mjs flags # gates on memory.workspace.enabled — read the `workspace:` linefalse(the default, and the value for any project that has not opted in) → skip the rest of this step entirely and go to step 1. A populated corpus must not change scout's behaviour for a project that never asked for it.true→ ifdocs/system/elements/holds any element, this scout run is a reconciliation, not a rediscovery:node .claude/skills/workspace/cli.mjs reconcile --touched <comma,separated,paths> --json # wraps workspace/reconcile.mjs -> reconcilemode: "reconcile"→ report the returneddelta(changed/unreferenced) for the slice being touched and go straight to step 3; the corpus already answers "what is this system".mode: "discovery"→ the corpus is absent or empty, so fall through to step 1 and scout normally.The delta carries exactly those two keys.
addedandstaleare deliberately absent fromreconcile.mjs:addedwould need a prior reconcile snapshot that does not exist, and staleness is decided per element byclassify, which/memory-syncStep 0e surfaces. Reporting a field the helper never returns is how a scout report comes to describe a delta nobody computed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 139 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 5c985075255c
scout is a skill published in the GitHub repository friedbotstudio/baseline (14 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 1,796 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-with-lsp
Code review with LSP-powered code intelligence. Uses MCP tools (diagnostics, hover, references, definition, symbols) for semantic code understanding, not just text grep.
i18n-check
An internationalization (i18n) check for software that supports multiple languages. It compares translation files with the text and translation keys used by the code.
vue-best-practices
A review checklist for Vue 2 and Vue 3 components, covering component names, prop declarations, TypeScript casts, API styles and complex template expressions.
gdpr-audit
GDPR compliance audit of code, plans, schemas, or IaC. Produces a findings report with article citations, severity, confidence, and fixes; flags evidence gaps. Not a substitute for a DPO/lawyer.
cognitive-walkthrough
Deep-dive usability evaluation of specific user tasks. Simulates novice user cognition step-by-step to identify learnability issues, unclear actions, and points of confusion.
owasp-ai-testing
AI trustworthiness testing using OWASP AI Testing Guide v1. Execute 32 test cases across 4 layers (Application, Model, Infrastructure, Data) with practical payloads and remediation.