Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to friedbotstudio/baseline. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/friedbotstudio/baseline/main/.claude/skills/swarm-plan/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/friedbotstudio/baselineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/swarm-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/swarm-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/swarm-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/swarm-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/swarm-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.01719 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00688 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
swarm-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
swarm-plan — Phase 5.5: decompose for parallel execution
Invoked after /approve-direction and before /tdd on any spec that has ≥ project.json → swarm.min_tasks_worth_swarming independent components worth parallelizing (default 1, so swarm is the default code-generation route). A spec whose dependency graph exposes no independent component falls through to /tdd solo.
Post-§18 amendment. Beyond the canonical .claude/state/swarm/<slug>.json plan, swarm-plan ALSO emits a runtime sub-track overlay at .claude/state/swarm/<slug>.jsonl (JSONL) when the chosen workflow track contains a selector node whose swarm-implementation alternate is chosen. The overlay's single line is a transient Track record with selectable: false, track_id: "swarm-runtime-<slug>", and nodes[] enumerating the swarm-worker dispatches as can_parallel: true peers. The harness reloads runtime overlays from .claude/state/swarm/*.jsonl at the same time it reads .claude/workflows.jsonl, so the runtime Track set is the union. The overlay is deleted by /archive along with the rest of the workflow's swarm state.
Prereqs
.claude/state/spec_approvals/<slug>.approvalexists (spec is human-approved).docs/specs/<slug>.mdexists and passes/spec-lint.docs/scout/<slug>.mdexists (component → file mapping is its job).
If any prereq is missing, stop and surface what's needed.
Output contract
.claude/state/swarm/<slug>.json:
{
"slug": "<slug>",
"spec": "docs/specs/<slug>.md",
"created_at": <epoch>,
"status": "planned",
"tasks": [
{
"id": "T-001",
"title": "<what the task does — one line>",
"component": "<component id from C4 Component diagram>",
"acs": ["AC-001", "AC-002"],
"write_set": ["src/foo/bar.py", "tests/foo/test_bar.py"],
"read_set": ["src/common/http.py"],
"depends_on": [],
"execution": "worker-safe"
}
],
"waves": null
}
You produce tasks[]. The validator (validate.mjs) computes waves[] deterministically via Kahn-with-disjointness.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 97 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A c3e5a773b50b
swarm-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository friedbotstudio/baseline (14 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 1,719 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-with-lsp
Code review with LSP-powered code intelligence. Uses MCP tools (diagnostics, hover, references, definition, symbols) for semantic code understanding, not just text grep.
i18n-check
An internationalization (i18n) check for software that supports multiple languages. It compares translation files with the text and translation keys used by the code.
vue-best-practices
A review checklist for Vue 2 and Vue 3 components, covering component names, prop declarations, TypeScript casts, API styles and complex template expressions.
gdpr-audit
GDPR compliance audit of code, plans, schemas, or IaC. Produces a findings report with article citations, severity, confidence, and fixes; flags evidence gaps. Not a substitute for a DPO/lawyer.
cognitive-walkthrough
Deep-dive usability evaluation of specific user tasks. Simulates novice user cognition step-by-step to identify learnability issues, unclear actions, and points of confusion.
owasp-ai-testing
AI trustworthiness testing using OWASP AI Testing Guide v1. Execute 32 test cases across 4 layers (Application, Model, Infrastructure, Data) with practical payloads and remediation.