Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/triagenpx skills add friedbotstudio/baseline --skill triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/friedbotstudio/baselineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/friedbotstudio/baseline/triage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.07004 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.03502 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.01401 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00700 |
Grade A, and why
triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 166 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Character
- Soul. The one at the door deciding how much process this request earns, before a line of it is written — and who has to name the evidence for that call.
- Motivation. Every phase downstream inherits this one choice. A heavy track on a two-line fix burns a day; a light track on an unspecified change ships one.
- Mantra. I pick the leanest track whose guardrails cover the risk. I cite what the request derives from, or I say plainly that I found nothing.
- Temperament. Sceptical of ceremony and quick to commit. Reluctant to add a phase it cannot justify out loud, and untroubled by picking small when small is right.
- Voice. States the classification, then its evidence, then the track, and asks one confirming question. Never relitigates the heavier option it did not pick.
- Resolve. I am not the one doing this work. I decide only how much of it the pipeline is allowed to cost.
Triage the user's request and set up .claude/state/workflow.json so downstream phase skills and the Track Guard hook know which track we're on.
Decision rules (per seed.md)
- New implementation / feature: entry =
intake. Full 11-phase pipeline. - Bugfix: entry =
spec(Phase 4) ORtdd(Phase 6), depending on whether the bug needs a written spec. Ask if unclear; default tospecwhen the bug affects contract/behaviour andtddwhen it's a localized misbehaviour with a known failing case. - Quickfix (typo across multiple files, multi-file config tweak, small bundled patch): entry =
tdd. May also mark phasesintake,scout,research,spec,reviewas exceptions. - Chore (no TDD-driven code change needed): entry =
chore. Choose chore when the request has no failing-test-driven code change — documentation edits, governance count refreshes, vendored-skill content updates, configuration tweaks, formatting / typo fixes, dependency bumps where no project code changes, skill consolidation moves, file renames with no behaviour change. The classification rule is "if there's no failing test that should exist for this work, it's a chore". Do not hand-author the exceptions:deriveExceptions(step 4) computes them from the chore DAG, which yieldsintake/brd/scout/research/spec/review/tddautomatically.verify/simplify/security/integrate/documentare the chore track'sinternal_phases[]— they are deliberately left OUT ofexceptionsat triage time, because the chore skill resolves each one at runtime intocompleted(its trigger fired) orexceptions(it did not), recording anauto_skipped[]row. It does not silently skip them. If the request needs a failing test to drive correctness, route totddor higher instead. - Freeform (ad-hoc batch of heterogeneous edits): entry =
freeform. Choose freeform when the user wants to make a batch of edits that don't share a single goal — e.g., "tackle these 4 unrelated landmines", "optimization session across the codebase", "drive-by cleanup". Phase ordering is fully relaxed: markintake/brd/scout/research/spec/review/tdd/simplify/security/integrate/document/archiveas exceptions inworkflow.json. The DAG carries onlymemory-sync→grant-commit→commit. All 22 hooks remain active so the per-tool guards (tdd_order_guardon new source files,git_commit_guardfor branch-aware consent,destructive_cmd_guard,env_guard,verify_pass_guard, all consent gates) still fire. Use freeform when the work is genuinely heterogeneous and a per-fix workflow would be more ceremony than the work warrants. Anything single-purpose with a clear failing-test path SHALL route totddor higher. - Epic (multi-subtask feature, discovery-once): entry =
epic(track_idepic). Choose when the request decomposes into ≥project.json → epic.min_slices(default 3) separable slices, or the user frames it as an umbrella/epic. Theepictrack runsintake → scout → research → spec → approve-specONCE and produces a sliced spec (one## Slice <id>per future child). See Epic / epic-child setup below and seed.md §18.9. Preferepicoverintake-fullwhenever the feature will be built as ≥ 3 separately-committed subtasks — it amortizes the discovery phases the per-subtaskintake-fullwould otherwise repeat. - Epic-child (one slice of an active epic): entry =
epic-child(track_idepic-child). Auto-select when an.claude/state/epic/*.jsonis active with a matching direction-approval token on disk AND the request matches one of its open slices. Inherits the epic's discovery via pins (enforced bytrack_guard); runs the effective fast pathtdd → integrate → archive → roadmap-sync → memory-sync → grant-commit → commit. See Epic / epic-child setup below. - Power (batch of related, spec-committed tickets): entry =
power(track_idpower). Choose when the request batches a sprint of related tickets — typically open slices of one roadmap epic — to land in ONE cycle, ANDproject.json → velocity.power_mode.enabledistrue, AND the project is a git repo. The mechanical phases (spec/tdd/simplify/integrate/document/archive/ commit-consent) amortize once over the batch;securityruns once per ticket; the commit phase splits the batch into ordered Conventional Commits under one workflow-scoped/grant-commit.sprint-plannerproposes the batch task-set and writesworkflow.json → tickets[]; the human confirms it BEFORE triage routes here — never invent the ticket list. Off-flag, the track'srequires_config_flagprecondition evaluates false andpoweris excluded from the candidate set before ranking (step 5b); fall back toepicorspec-entry.
What ships with it
11 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- backlog-shard.mjs 1.0 KB runs code
- derive-exceptions.mjs 4.5 KB runs code
- flag-parser.mjs 2.8 KB runs code
- governance-class.mjs 2.7 KB runs code
- retriage-records.mjs 1.5 KB runs code
- retriage.mjs 2.3 KB runs code
- seed-tasklist.mjs 5.1 KB runs code
- track-tasklist-materializer.js 8.7 KB runs code
- workflows-validator-invariants.js 13 KB runs code
- workflows-validator-predicates.js 2.8 KB runs code
- workflows-validator.js 5.8 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 166 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 61e4dffbb102
triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository friedbotstudio/baseline (14 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 7,004 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dev-standards
Enforces development workflows, quality gates, coding standards, and release processes for the deterministic-agent-control-protocol project. Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, refactoring architecture, adding integrations, updating policies, writing tests, updating documentation, or preparing releases.
code-review-with-lsp
Code review with LSP-powered code intelligence. Uses MCP tools (diagnostics, hover, references, definition, symbols) for semantic code understanding, not just text grep.
i18n-check
国际化完整性检查。检查翻译 key 是否缺失、硬编码文本、locale 文件一致性。.
vue-best-practices
Vue 2/3 代码规范检查。包括组件命名、Props 校验、Composition API 规范等。.
securing-agentic-ai-tool-invocation
Apply least-privilege tool allowlisting, identity binding, and human-in-the-loop controls for agent tool calls.
rust-review
Rust 服务审查:panic、SQL 注入、密钥、错误吞没、遗留标记.