Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fritzandfriends/blazorwebformscomponents/test-disciplinenpx skills add FritzAndFriends/BlazorWebFormsComponents --skill test-disciplinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FritzAndFriends/BlazorWebFormsComponentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fritzandfriends/blazorwebformscomponents/test-discipline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fritzandfriends/blazorwebformscomponents/test-discipline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fritzandfriends/blazorwebformscomponents/test-discipline.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00413 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
test-discipline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test-discipline — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Context
When APIs or public interfaces change, tests must be updated in the same commit. When test assertions reference file counts or expected arrays, they must be kept in sync with disk reality. Stale tests block CI for other contributors.
Patterns
- API changes → test updates (same commit): If you change a function signature, public interface, or exported API, update the corresponding tests before committing
- Test assertions → disk reality: When test files contain expected counts (e.g.,
EXPECTED_FEATURES,EXPECTED_SCENARIOS), they must match the actual files on disk - Add files → update assertions: When adding docs pages, features, or any counted resource, update the test assertion array in the same commit
- CI failures → check assertions first: Before debugging complex failures, verify test assertion arrays match filesystem state
Examples
✓ Correct:
- Changed auth API signature → updated auth.test.ts in same commit
- Added
distributed-mesh.mdto features/ → added'distributed-mesh'to EXPECTED_FEATURES array - Deleted two scenario files → removed entries from EXPECTED_SCENARIOS
✗ Incorrect:
- Changed spawn parameters → committed without updating casting.test.ts (CI breaks for next person)
- Added
built-in-roles.md→ left EXPECTED_FEATURES at old count (PR blocked) - Test says "expected 7 files" but disk has 25 (assertion staleness)
Anti-Patterns
- Committing API changes without test updates ("I'll fix tests later")
- Treating test assertion arrays as static (they evolve with content)
- Assuming CI passing means coverage is correct (stale assertions can pass while being wrong)
- Leaving gaps for other agents to discover
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 38 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 6efe81cabcd2
test-discipline is a skill published in the GitHub repository FritzAndFriends/BlazorWebFormsComponents (449 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 413 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test-discipline, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
lumeo
Use when building or editing a Blazor UI that uses the Lumeo component library (the Lumeo NuGet package and its satellites Lumeo.Charts / Lumeo.DataGrid / Lumeo.Editor / Lumeo.Scheduler / Lumeo.Gantt / Lumeo.Motion), or when the user mentions Lumeo components (Button, DataGrid, Sheet, Dialog, Tabs, DatePicker, Toast…
sync-repos
Synchronize external repositories used by PKMDS-Blazor. Use when asked to sync, get latest, refresh related repos, inspect upstream changes, or prepare work that depends on current PKHeX, PokeAPI, Pokemon Showdown, sprites, or plugin sources.
address-pr-feedback
Address unresolved GitHub pull request review feedback in PKMDS-Blazor. Use when asked to handle PR comments, review threads, requested changes, or reviewer follow-up.
implement-issue
Implement a PKMDS-Blazor GitHub issue end to end. Use when asked to investigate and implement an issue, bug, feature request, or feature-parity item and prepare it for review.
blazorbindings-maui-third-party
Integrate third-party .NET MAUI control libraries into BlazorBindings.Maui apps by generating Razor wrappers, registering attached properties, and bridging to native elements for imperative APIs such as popups or bottom sheets. Use when adding, updating, or troubleshooting a MAUI control package in a…
csharp-dotnet
Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or shipping C# / .NET code — ASP.NET Core APIs (minimal APIs vs controllers), EF Core data access, async correctness, solution layout in .cs/.csproj/.sln. NOT a Java/Spring backend (that is spring-boot), NOT a Node/TypeScript backend (that is nestjs), NOT framework-neutral REST…