Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk/main/.agents/skills/run-retro/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frostney/pascal-mcp-sdkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk/run-retro)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk/run-retro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk/run-retro.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.00879 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00439 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
run-retro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Run retrospective
Assess the completed workstream through delivery-speed, process, and
codebase-health lenses. The actual grilling skill owns the decision loop.
Apply only documentation edits and ticket actions the user selects from the
detailed summary.
Gates
- Define the workstream boundary from the current conversation, handoff, diffs, commits, issues, PRs, reviews, checks, outcomes, and rework. Record unavailable evidence and lower confidence; do not invent a narrative or broaden into a repository audit.
- Invoke
grillingwith the evidence and candidates. Do not imitate it with ad-hoc questions; stop if it is unavailable. Let it ask one decision at a time with a recommendation. Act only after it reaches shared understanding and confirms the exact action set. - Assess all three lenses, even when one produces no durable finding:
- Delivery speed: less waiting, rework, handoff friction, unnecessary scope, or cognitive load without weakening quality.
- Process: planning, decisions, handoffs, gates, tools, and collaboration.
- Codebase: architecture, maintainability, tests, developer experience, reliability, and accumulated friction.
- Promote only generalized, project-level lessons supported by evidence. Exclude chronology, one-off mistakes, personal preferences, duplicates, existing rules, and speculation.
Route each lesson
- Documentation edit: durable guidance in existing contracts, READMEs,
docs/, ADRs, AGENTS, skills, templates, policies, or contributor guidance. Prefer tightening or coupling with existing text. Direct edits are limited to documentation. - Follow-up ticket: source, executable configuration, or other implementation
is needed. Offer more detail, further grilling, normal or automatic
create-issue, or skip; the delegated workflow retains its own gates. - Report only: useful evidence warrants neither an edit nor a ticket.
Use both edit and ticket only when the guidance and its implementation are separately necessary. A missing document may be created only when the user selects its exact proposed contents.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 84 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A f1c1ff5e8d1b
run-retro is a skill published in the GitHub repository frostney/pascal-mcp-sdk (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 879 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
problem-management
Manage ServiceNow problems — create from linked incidents, proactive pattern detection, RCA with 5-Whys, knownerror workarounds (KEDB), KEDB search by CI/category/keywords, and permanent-fix linkage to changes.
change-management
Create and transition ServiceNow change requests (normal/standard/emergency), change tasks, affected CIs, approval routing, CAB scheduling, and conflict detection across maintenance windows.
hr-service-delivery
Build ServiceNow HR Service Delivery — snhrcorecase from Employee Center or HR catalog, snhrlelifecycleevent onboarding/offboarding with templated activities, and HR document generation.
incident-management
Manage ServiceNow incidents — creation with impact/urgency priority calc, auto-assignment by category, reassignment tracking, major incident declaration with bridge calls, time-based escalation, MTTR metrics.
bob-update
Check for Hacker Bob package updates and guide project-local update installation from Codex.
agile-development
ServiceNow Agile Development 2.0 — the rmteam → rmsprint → rmstory → rmepic model, the state and point values ServiceNow actually accepts, how a story is attached to a sprint, and the reporting tools (board, burndown, velocity, capacity, standup, retrospective).