Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cli/claim-filing-walkthroughnpx skills add fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cli --skill claim-filing-walkthroughgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cli/claim-filing-walkthrough)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cli/claim-filing-walkthrough"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cli/claim-filing-walkthrough.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00197 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
claim-filing-walkthrough scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 19 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 17bf52363d73
claim-filing-walkthrough is a skill published in the GitHub repository fru-dev3/fd-apps-prevail-cli (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 197 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
policy
Define and enforce policies, access controls, and compliance rules over Semantica knowledge graphs.
auditable-resource
Wire a module's resource into the generic change-proposal / change-history pipeline so every mutation is auditable, agent-proposable, and (optionally) gated behind staff approval. Use this skill when adding a new resource type that needs proposal-plus-decide semantics, a propose-CLI verb, or a tamper-evident edit…
code-governance
针对 PR diff 输出结构化合规治理报告. 检查 license / PII / 合规元数据 / 审计 trail. 专为 EU AI Act / 中国网信办算法备案 / 金融医疗合规驱动客户设计.
lenserfight-product-policy-architect
Use when converting ambiguous privacy, follower, deletion, and friendship product requirements into explicit platform policy and state-transition rules.
legal-contract-reviewer
Plain-language contract summary, clause-risk table, and questions to ask a lawyer. Analysis only — NOT legal advice.
legal-review-comparison
Battle template comparing AI legal-review outputs on identical contract text. Analysis only — NOT legal advice.