Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fubits1/svelte-skills --skill pixel-perfectgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fubits1/svelte-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fubits1/svelte-skills/pixel-perfect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fubits1/svelte-skills/pixel-perfect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fubits1/svelte-skills/pixel-perfect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fubits1/svelte-skills/pixel-perfect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fubits1/svelte-skills/pixel-perfect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00337 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
pixel-perfect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 82 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pixel-Perfect: Mandatory Measurement Workflow
When making any CSS change or HTML element swap (e.g. <dl> to <ul>, <div> to <section>), follow this workflow exactly. Screenshots alone prove NOTHING about pixel parity, only measured numbers do.
Step 1: Measure BEFORE (while original code is still in place)
Use browser_evaluate to capture exact values for every affected element:
// Capture dimensions
el.getBoundingClientRect() // width, height, x, y
// Capture computed styles — the ACTUAL rendered values, not what CSS says
getComputedStyle(el).display // may differ from your CSS (global overrides!)
getComputedStyle(el).gap
getComputedStyle(el).margin
getComputedStyle(el).padding
getComputedStyle(el).lineHeight
getComputedStyle(el).fontSize
Store these numbers. Report them. They are your baseline.
Critical: Measure ACTUAL computed styles, not what you think the CSS does
Global styles, resets, and browser defaults frequently override scoped CSS. A <dl> might render as display: grid; gap: 16px even though scoped CSS says display: flex; gap: 8px. Never assume, always measure.
Step 2: Make the code change
Edit the HTML/CSS.
Step 3: Measure AFTER
Navigate to the same page. Measure the same elements with browser_evaluate. Report the numbers side by side.
Beware HMR staleness
After git stash pop, git checkout, or file restoration, the dev server may serve stale CSS. Touch the file (touch path/to/file) and hard-reload before measuring.
Step 4: Compare and report
Report a table:
| Metric | Before | After | Diff |
| -------------- | ------ | ----- | ---- |
| footer height | 396px | 396px | 0 |
| section height | 98px | 98px | 0 |
Step 5: Investigate any diff
If any measurement differs by even 1px:
- Do not dismiss it. Do not say "close enough" or "imperceptible."
- Investigate the root cause: default margins, line-heights, display mode, gap values, global style overrides.
- Fix it to 0px diff.
- Measure again to prove the fix.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 1815f8679696
pixel-perfect is a skill published in the GitHub repository fubits1/svelte-skills (10 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
pixel-perfect compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pixel-perfectfubits1/svelte-skills | Skill | 10 | 12d ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| anti-slop-designsickn33/agentic-awesome-skills | Skill | 49k | yesterday | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |
| chakra-ui-builderchakra-ui/chakra-ui | Skill | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 214 | Claude Code, Codex |
| visual-ralphYeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex | Skill | 34k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Codex |
| frontend-ui-dark-tsmicrosoft/skills | Skill | 3.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |
| open-design-setupcompozy/compozy | Skill | 2.8k | yesterday | MIT | A | 67 | Claude Code, Codex |
| frontend-visual-qadaymade/claude-code-skills | Skill | 1.5k | yesterday | MIT | A | 125 | Claude Code, Codex |