Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit --skill freeform-datagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fullstack-phoenix/saas_kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit/freeform-data)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit/freeform-data"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit/freeform-data/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit/freeform-data"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit/freeform-data.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.02074 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00830 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00207 |
Grade A, and why
freeform-data scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 263 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Freeform Data
Use this skill when an AI feature should return text, code, markdown, or loose JSON instead of a validated schema.
Goal
- Reuse the shared
MyApp.Agentsconfiguration. - Keep a low-level
MyApp.Agents.LLMmodule for provider-specific requests. - Let task-specific modules build on top of that helper.
- Keep tests isolated with Mimic.
Root Agents Module
Use one shared root module for API keys and model names:
defmodule MyApp.Agents do
@moduledoc """
Central configuration for AI agents.
"""
def anthropic_key, do: Application.get_env(:my_app, :anthropic)[:api_key]
def openai_key, do: Application.get_env(:my_app, :openai)[:api_key]
def model(:haiku), do: "claude-haiku-4-5"
def model(:sonnet), do: "claude-sonnet-4-5"
def model(:gpt_5_mini), do: "gpt-5-mini"
def model(:gpt_5), do: "gpt-5.2"
def model(:gpt_4_1_mini), do: "gpt-4.1-mini"
end
Credential Placement
Do not put provider credentials in shared config/config.exs.
Keep local credentials in config/dev.exs:
config :my_app, :anthropic, api_key: System.get_env("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY")
config :my_app, :openai, api_key: System.get_env("OPENAI_API_KEY")
Low-level LLM Module
Keep one shared helper module for raw LLM calls:
defmodule MyApp.Agents.LLM do
import MyApp.Agents
@claude_url "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages"
@openai_url "https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions"
def claude(content, opts \\ [])
def claude("" <> content, opts) do
[%{role: "user", content: content}]
|> claude(opts)
end
def claude(messages, opts) when is_list(messages) do
model_name = Keyword.get(opts, :model, model(:haiku))
max_tokens = Keyword.get(opts, :max_tokens, 4_096)
extract_code = Keyword.get(opts, :extract_code, false)
extract_json = Keyword.get(opts, :extract_json, false)
Req.post(@claude_url,
headers: [
{"Content-Type", "application/json"},
{"x-api-key", anthropic_key()},
{"anthropic-version", "2023-06-01"}
],
receive_timeout: 90_000,
json: %{
max_tokens: max_tokens,
model: model_name,
messages: messages
}
)
|> parse()
|> maybe_extract_code(extract_code)
|> maybe_extract_json(extract_json)
end
def openai(content, opts \\ [])
def openai("" <> content, opts) do
[%{role: "user", content: content}]
|> openai(opts)
end
def openai(messages, opts) when is_list(messages) do
model_name = Keyword.get(opts, :model, model(:gpt_5_mini))
reasoning_effort = Keyword.get(opts, :reasoning_effort, "medium")
max_tokens = Keyword.get(opts, :max_tokens, 4_096)
extract_code = Keyword.get(opts, :extract_code, false)
extract_json = Keyword.get(opts, :extract_json, false)
prediction = Keyword.get(opts, :prediction)
Req.post(@openai_url,
headers: [
{"Content-Type", "application/json"},
{"Authorization", "Bearer #{openai_key()}"}
],
receive_timeout: 90_000,
json:
%{
model: model_name,
max_completion_tokens: max_tokens,
messages: messages
}
|> maybe_add_reasoning_effort(reasoning_effort, model_name)
|> maybe_add_prediction(prediction)
)
|> parse()
|> maybe_extract_code(extract_code)
|> maybe_extract_json(extract_json)
end
defp maybe_add_prediction(json, "" <> content) do
json
|> Map.delete(:max_completion_tokens)
|> Map.put(:prediction, %{content: content, type: "content"})
|> Map.put(:model, model(:gpt_4_1_mini))
end
defp maybe_add_prediction(json, _), do: json
defp maybe_add_reasoning_effort(json, "" <> reasoning_effort, model_name)
when model_name in [model(:gpt_5), "o4-mini", "o3", "o3-mini"] do
Map.put(json, :reasoning_effort, reasoning_effort)
end
defp maybe_add_reasoning_effort(json, _, _), do: json
defp parse({:ok, %{body: %{"content" => [content | _]}}}) do
case content do
%{"text" => text, "type" => type} -> {:ok, %{content: text, type: type}}
_ -> {:error, %{content: "No result"}}
end
end
defp parse({:ok, %{body: %{"choices" => [choice | _]}}}) do
case choice do
%{"message" => %{"content" => content}} -> {:ok, %{content: content}}
_ -> {:error, %{content: "No result"}}
end
end
defp parse(_), do: {:error, %{content: "No result"}}
defp maybe_extract_code({:ok, %{content: content}}, true) do
{:ok, %{content: extract_code(content)}}
end
defp maybe_extract_code(result, _), do: result
defp maybe_extract_json({:ok, %{content: content}}, true) do
{:ok, %{content: extract_json(content)}}
end
defp maybe_extract_json(result, _), do: result
defp extract_code(content) do
content
|> String.replace("```elixir", "```")
|> String.replace("```javascript", "```")
|> String.replace("```json", "```")
|> String.trim()
|> String.split("```")
|> case do
[_, code | _] -> code
[text] -> text
end
end
def extract_json(text_or_json) do
text_or_json
|> String.replace("```json", "```")
|> String.trim()
|> String.split("```")
|> case do
[_, json | _] -> json
[json] -> json
end
|> Jason.decode!()
rescue
_ -> %{}
end
end
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 263 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A c4317aab2dfd
freeform-data is a skill published in the GitHub repository fullstack-phoenix/saas_kit (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 2,074 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
prompt-engineer
Writes, refactors, and evaluates prompts for LLMs — generating optimized prompt templates, structured output schemas, evaluation rubrics, and test suites. Use when designing prompts for new LLM applications, refactoring existing prompts for better accuracy or token efficiency, implementing chain-of-thought or few-shot…
prompt-optimization
Improve a prompt on the evaluations workbench through a measured loop. Score the baseline first, then duplicate the target column, form a hypothesis from failing rows, edit the copy's prompt draft, run, compare pass rate and cost, and repeat until the numbers hold. Use when the user asks to optimize or improve a…
omh-model-optimization
This is a Hermes-native model-optimization workflow skill.
ideogram4
Prompting patterns for Ideogram 4 text-to-image — best-in-class in-image text rendering and exact color/layout control via structured JSON captions. Use when generating images that need legible on-image text (title cards, thumbnails, logos, signage, CTAs), precise brand colors, or controlled spatial layout. Triggers…
prompt-library-for-startups
AWS-curated copy-paste prompts for AI coding agents (MVP scaffolding, RAG chatbot with Claude on Bedrock, security baseline evaluation, cost anomaly detection, GPU quota requests, EKS deployment, Well-Architected review, etc.) plus downloadable installable agents (Multi-Account Transition Advisor, Bill Shock…