Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fullymiddleaged/clawness/security-auditnpx skills add fullymiddleaged/Clawness --skill security-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fullymiddleaged/ClawnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fullymiddleaged/clawness/security-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fullymiddleaged/clawness/security-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fullymiddleaged/clawness/security-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00142 | $0.01092 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00071 | $0.00546 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
security-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Audit Workflow
A stateful adversarial audit. Discovery is deterministic (clawness scan),
judgment accumulates in a ledger (.clawness/security/findings.json), so runs
converge instead of repeating.
Before spawning agents: the red/blue-team pass launches several adversarial sub-agents and is token-intensive. If you surfaced this proactively (the user mentioned security but didn't explicitly ask to run it), first ask: "Want me to run the full red team / blue team audit now?" and proceed only once they confirm. Running
clawness scanitself is cheap and deterministic — you may run that first to show the surface, then ask before fanning out agents. If the user explicitly invoked/clawness:security-auditor already said yes, skip the question.
The CLI isn't on PATH — reach it through the stashed wrapper:
CLAW="${CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR:-$HOME/.claude}/clawness/clawness-cli.sh"
bash "$CLAW" scan --project . # enumerate + accumulate the ledger
bash "$CLAW" scan status --project . # show coverage without re-scanning
If $CLAW doesn't exist, the bootstrap hasn't run yet — start a fresh session.
Steps
-
Enumerate (deterministic, free) — Run
bash "$CLAW" scan --project <scope>. This lists sink/source candidates (SQL/command injection, unsafe deserialization, XSS, path traversal, broken authz, hardcoded secrets, weak crypto, SSRF), each with a CWE, a mapped rule id, and a stable id, and merges them into the ledger. Note the coverage line it prints. Use--new-onlyto see just what hasn't been adjudicated yet,--class <name>to focus one category. -
Scope — If the user named a module or directory, pass it as
--projectand focus there. Otherwise let the scan cover the tree and prioritise the security-sensitive candidates (auth, authorization, data validation, endpoints, queries, secret handling). -
Red Team — adjudicate only what's NEW. Delegate to the
security-red-teamsub-agent, handing it the candidates whose ledger status isnew(fromscan --new-only): "Adjudicate these enumerated candidates. For each, decide confirmed / false-positive and give the attack path and file:line. Check for current-month CVEs affecting our stack. Also look for classes the enumerator can't see (logic flaws, auth bypass, IDOR beyond the heuristic). Do NOT re-litigate items already marked confirmed/false-positive/fixed." Have it write each verdict back to the ledger.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 84 lines · 142 tokens per session scan A 8fe4c4736eef
security-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository fullymiddleaged/Clawness (3 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 142 tokens to every session and 1,092 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
issue-triage
Issue triage: audit open issues, categorize, detect duplicates, cross-ref PRs, risk assessment, post comments. Args: "all" for deep analysis of all, issue numbers to focus (e.g. "42 57"), "en"/"fr" for language, no arg = audit only in French.
performance
CLI performance optimization - startup time, memory usage, token savings benchmarking.
build-teaql-app
Build or change a TeaQL application in Java, Rust, Go, Swift, Python, C#/.NET, or TypeScript, including Kotlin/JVM applications that consume Java-generated libraries. Mandatory order: first draft and save a complete KSML model, then verify the client and evaluate that saved model, repair it through repeated evaluation…
hns-workflow-ci-loop
Unified CI watch + auto-fix loop skill. Polls gh pr checks after /moai sync PR creation, classifies required vs auxiliary failures, attempts safe automated patches (max 3 iterations), and escalates semantic failures to the user. Use for CI loop workflow — NOT for general loop iteration patterns (see…
moai-kanban-foreman
One unattended kanban foreman iteration: watch the backlog queue, dispatch the next operator-picked card to an isolated worker, collect completion evidence on read (not on claims), and report. This is the body the project's loop.md driver invokes each iteration of a bare /loop; it can also be invoked directly to test…
moai-ref-ui-polish
UI polish and interface-completion reference: the small visual details — concentric border radius, optical alignment, shadow-vs-border, motion easing, typography smoothing, tabular numbers, icon stroke weight, hit areas — that separate polished interfaces from generic ones. Agent-extending skill that amplifies…