Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp/main/.claude/skills/implement/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp/implement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp/implement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp/implement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp/implement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01127 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00451 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Implement: $ARGUMENTS
For pipeline discipline (background spawns, one writer per artifact, verdict routing, landing chains) reference /orchestrate. This skill is implementation-specific.
Step 0: Gate
The prefill's one review round is complete and the planner's fix pass has been read back against the annotations (the orchestrate gates). Fetch the review; no implementer spawns on an unreviewed prefill or before the fix pass is read back. A finding the reviewer placed under "resolvable only by" the implementer goes into the brief as a binding what-to-test entry. In the fast lane there is no prefill: the ticket carries the lane determination with its reason (the orchestrate skill's lane section), and the ticket's numbered requirements are the what-to-test list. Create the implementer's isolated checkout of the ticket's branch at the current tip; record the tip.
Step 1: Spawn the implementer (background)
One implementer, the whole ticket, one checkout, one commit. The brief opens with this block verbatim:
EXECUTION DIRECTIVE. Ticket <id>; prefill <plan id, or "none: fast lane, the ticket's numbered requirements are the what-to-test list and the research findings are the touch points">; checkout <absolute path> on <branch> at <tip>.
Before your first write, confirm the checkout is at that tip and carries no other lane's work.
Build every numbered requirement. For every what-to-test entry: the test, red on the tree before your change, the change, green after, both pasted. Seams run both real sides on the harness the prefill names. Corpus checks over the touched shapes, hits read. Comments and docs the change made wrong are part of the change.
Where the prefill is silent, decide as a senior engineer on this codebase would and record the choice as a finding. Stop only for a decision the user owns: removing scope, a wire shape, a destructive operation, a security posture.
Tests run against spawned services on picked ports with an isolated home; the operator's services and stores are never touched. Never delete or skip a test to get green. Never a flag that forces cached tests to re-run, never a private build cache, never a git identity change, never a commit-hook bypass.
One commit on <branch>; do not push, rebase or merge. Report what is NOT done first, then the commit, the test table with red and green output, the seams, the checks, and the choices you made.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines b737d8abb6e8
- 1mo ago Changed · -229 lines · +22 tokens per session 420dda7f1639
- 2mo ago First seen · 310 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A fb37ba3b9e44
implement is a skill published in the GitHub repository fulminate-io/knowledge-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,127 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…