Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fusengine/codex --skill think-in-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fusengine/codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/codex/think-in-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/codex/think-in-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fusengine/codex/think-in-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/codex/think-in-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fusengine/codex/think-in-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00951 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00190 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
think-in-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed 028c16268b9d
- 1mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 34e1d1c7c7c6
think-in-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository fusengine/codex (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 951 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
smiles-validation
Strict SMILES validation, structural comparison, and modification verification. Catches invalid LLM-generated molecules.
confirm-failures-are-causally-linked-to-the-task-before-reportin
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
isolate-the-specific-failure-mode-before-proposing-a-fix
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
ci-fix-monitor
Codex adapter for monitoring and fixing CI failures on opencode-swarm PRs. Use when diagnosing failed checks, fixing package-check (npm tarball) failures, resolving quality/lint/format errors, fixing macOS cross-platform file I/O failures, or watching a PR until all checks are green.
swarm-ci-monitor
Codex adapter for end-to-end CI monitoring of an already-reviewed PR in opencode-swarm. Use when the user wants the swarm to monitor a reviewed-and-approved PR's CI, research every failure exhaustively, fix end-to-end, iterate until green (max 5 cycles), then merge. Composes ci-fix-monitor for fix recipes.
issue-tracer
Use when asked to trace, investigate, root-cause, reproduce, plan, fix, resolve, close, or prepare a PR for an issue, bug report, defect, regression, failing test, or confusing runtime behavior. This Codex adapter delegates to the canonical protocol at .opencode, which owns the Full-Resolution Contract, reproduction…