Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fusengine/codex --skill verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fusengine/codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/codex/verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/codex/verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fusengine/codex/verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/codex/verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fusengine/codex/verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00539 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +3 lines 752af485fe27
- 1mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 7092370585f8
verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository fusengine/codex (2 stars, last pushed 4d ago), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,348 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
reproduce
Reproduces a paper's result, a claim, an artifact or a previous run with the target and success criterion frozen first, the canonical code path run before any substitute, exact inputs, environment, seeds and commands captured, and a verdict from a fixed set, reproduced, reproduced within tolerance, partially…
safe-rename
Workflow for safely renaming symbols (functions, types, classes, interfaces, constants, variables) across a codebase. Uses repomap, batchsymbols, and buildcheck to ensure every consumer is updated and nothing breaks.
test-file-split
Protocol for splitting test files that approach or exceed the FR-006 500-line limit (enforced in CI by scripts/check-test-file-cap.ts as a diff-scoped ratchet). Covers describe-block extraction, shared helper management, pure-function extraction, mock isolation verification, and cascading-split detection. Load when a…
run-affected-test-file-in-isolation-and-in-co-run-with-its-test-
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
run-affected-test-suite-end-to-end-after-multi-file-signature-ch
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
run-relevant-tests-after-adding-error-handling-wrappers
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.