Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add future-agi/agent-learning-kit --skill write-scenariosgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/future-agi/agent-learning-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/future-agi/agent-learning-kit/write-scenarios)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/future-agi/agent-learning-kit/write-scenarios"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/future-agi/agent-learning-kit/write-scenarios/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/future-agi/agent-learning-kit/write-scenarios"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/future-agi/agent-learning-kit/write-scenarios.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.08305 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.04152 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01661 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00830 |
Grade A, and why
write-scenarios scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 607 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A f5123171064d
write-scenarios is a skill published in the GitHub repository future-agi/agent-learning-kit (119 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 8,305 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-custom-grader
Use when converting an existing benchmark, rubric, verifier, task YAML/JSON, or domain check into SkillEvaluator BYOG/BYOT custom evaluation.
eval-driven-development
Build offline evaluation suites that score probabilistic LLM/agent quality, distinct from deterministic tests.
rag-evaluation
Use this skill to evaluate the quality of a RAG pipeline on faithfulness, answer relevancy, context precision, context recall, and hallucination rate. Activates after a RAG system is implemented or when retrieval quality is in question. Produces a structured evaluation report with measurable results.
foundry-hosted-agent-validation
Step-by-step process for validating a Python Foundry hosted agent sample (under python/samples/04-hosting/foundry-hosted-agents/) end to end — running it locally (native runtime and azd ai agent run) and after deploying it to an Azure AI Foundry project with azd. Use this when asked to validate a hosted agent sample.
langsmith-observability
LLM observability platform for tracing, evaluation, and monitoring. Use when debugging LLM applications, evaluating model outputs against datasets, monitoring production systems, or building systematic testing pipelines for AI applications.
build-and-test
How to build and test .NET projects in the Agent Framework repository. Use this when verifying or testing changes.