Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FutureRootsDE/legal-audit-de --skill legal-verify-expertsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FutureRootsDE/legal-audit-deWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/legal-verify-experts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/legal-verify-experts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/legal-verify-experts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/legal-verify-experts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/legal-verify-experts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00760 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
legal-verify-experts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 65 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A aa5ccf9c50c7
legal-verify-experts is a skill published in the GitHub repository FutureRootsDE/legal-audit-de (36 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 760 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
shop-check
This skill should be used when the user asks to "check my online shop", "audit my e-commerce site", "is my shop legal", "Impressum prüfen", "Button-Lösung", "zahlungspflichtig bestellen", "Widerrufsbelehrung prüfen", "AGB prüfen", "PAngV", "Preisangaben MwSt", "Versandkosten angeben", "Widerrufsformular"…
bfsg-check
This skill should be used when the user asks about "BFSG", "Barrierefreiheit", "Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz", "accessibility audit", "WCAG", "barrierefrei", "Web Content Accessibility", "EAA", "European Accessibility Act", "Barrierefreiheitserklärung", "ARIA", "Kontrast prüfen", "Screenreader", "keyboard…
legal-audit
This skill should be used when the user asks to "check privacy compliance", "audit GDPR", "is this legal", "do we need a DPA", "check our privacy policy", "DSGVO check", "is our site compliant", "update the privacy policy", "cookie consent legal", "Datenschutz", "Impressum", "TTDSG", "data protection", "review our…
widerruf-check
This skill should be used when the user asks about "Widerruf", "consent withdrawal", "Einwilligung widerrufen", "Widerruf-Button", "Opt-out", "Art. 7(3)", "Cookie Widerruf", "Einwilligung zurückziehen", "so einfach wie die Einwilligung", "Ablehnen-Button", "Cookie-Banner Ablehnen", or asks whether consent withdrawal…
legal-research
Use when the user asks anything about German or European law — statutes (BGB, StGB, AO, EStG, KSchG, AGG, …), EU regulations/directives (GDPR, AI Act, MiCA, NIS2, DSA, DMA, …), federal court decisions (BGH, BVerfG, BAG, BSG, BFH, BPatG), CJEU judgments, or legal-compliance questions in code or documents. Triggers on…
beopsuny
A Korean-law research and contract-review assistant for in-house lawyers and compliance teams. It checks current primary sources, such as official laws and court decisions, and shows how reliable each source is.