Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FuzzyKala/cc-templates --skill setup-multi-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FuzzyKala/cc-templatesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fuzzykala/cc-templates/setup-multi-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fuzzykala/cc-templates/setup-multi-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fuzzykala/cc-templates/setup-multi-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fuzzykala/cc-templates/setup-multi-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fuzzykala/cc-templates/setup-multi-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00079 | $0.01857 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00743 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00371 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00186 |
Grade B, and why
setup-multi-agent scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
- If it exists, append `${TEMPLATES_DIR}/gitignore-additions.txt` to it — but first grep for `.gemini/` to avoid double-appending if the user runs the skill twice. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/setup-multi-agent — Bootstrap a new project
Drop the AGENTS.md + CLAUDE.md pair into a target project so all three coding CLIs (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Antigravity CLI) load the same canonical project context. AGENTS.md is the canonical source; CLAUDE.md is a 1-line @AGENTS.md import so Claude Code (which doesn't yet natively read AGENTS.md) gets the same content.
Prerequisites
The cc-templates repo must be available locally. The skill reads three files from its templates/ directory:
templates/AGENTS.md.templatetemplates/CLAUDE.md.templatetemplates/gitignore-additions.txt
Step 0 below locates that directory. If any of the three files is missing after resolution, fail loudly and stop.
Steps
0. Locate the templates directory
This skill is usually invoked from a symlinked install at the skill directory (via symlink chain) that points back into the cct repo, so templates/ is NOT a sibling of SKILL.md. Resolve the real cct repo root by following the skill's own symlink and walking up three levels.
The harness reports the skill's base directory at invocation. Pass that path through readlink -f and ascend three directories — the skill lives at <cct-repo>/.agents/skills/setup-multi-agent/, so up-three lands at <cct-repo>:
# Replace <skill-base-dir> with the path the harness reported at invocation.
SKILL_DIR_RESOLVED="$(readlink -f "<skill-base-dir>")"
CCT_ROOT="$(readlink -f "${SKILL_DIR_RESOLVED}/../../..")"
TEMPLATES_DIR="${CCT_ROOT}/templates"
# Verify the three template files exist; fail loudly if any are missing.
missing=0
for f in AGENTS.md.template CLAUDE.md.template gitignore-additions.txt; do
if [ ! -r "${TEMPLATES_DIR}/${f}" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Missing template at ${TEMPLATES_DIR}/${f}" >&2
missing=1
fi
done
[ "${missing}" -eq 0 ] || exit 1
echo "Templates dir resolved: ${TEMPLATES_DIR}"
Use the resolved ${TEMPLATES_DIR} (or the absolute path the snippet prints) in all subsequent steps. This works whether the skill is invoked from a symlinked install or directly from inside the cct repo; the readlink -f step is what lets symlinked installs resolve to the real cct repo root instead of the symlink path.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 128 lines · 79 tokens per session scan B e6dc9ca4a248
setup-multi-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository FuzzyKala/cc-templates (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 1,857 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
testing-api-authentication-weaknesses
Tests API authentication mechanisms for weaknesses including broken token validation, missing authentication on endpoints, weak password policies, credential stuffing susceptibility, token leakage in URLs or logs, and session management flaws. The tester evaluates JWT implementation, API key handling, OAuth flows, and…
authentication-session-testing
Black-box testing of the full authentication and session lifecycle - registration, login, MFA, password reset, recovery, email change, logout, refresh, device trust - and session token handling including fixation, invalidation, replay, and cross-context binding.
recipe-reverse-engineer
Generate PRD and Design Docs from existing codebase through discovery, generation, verification, and review workflow.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
recipe-diagnose
Investigate problem, verify findings, and derive solutions.
recipe-front-design
Execute from repository evidence through applicable UI Spec and optional ADR decisions to complete frontend Design Doc approval.