deductive-reasoning

deductive-reasoning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from fzfclee/consulting-skills. It costs 58 tokens per session (707 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A method for checking whether a conclusion follows from stated rules, definitions, criteria, or facts. It tests logical validity separately from whether the starting facts are true.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for policy checks, rule-based decisions, consistency reviews, and if-then reasoning.
Why use it?
It helps reveal missing premises, invalid reasoning, unclear scope, and exceptions before accepting a decision.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for policy checks, rule-based decisions, consistency reviews, and if-then reasoning.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add fzfclee/consulting-skills --skill deductive-reasoning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fzfclee/consulting-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for deductive-reasoning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for deductive-reasoning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/deductive-reasoning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 58 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 707 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00058 $0.00707
Opus 5 $0.00029 $0.00353
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00141
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00071

Measured 8d ago against content hash 55ba5b630965, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

deductive-reasoning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/deductive-reasoning/SKILL.md · 77 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Deductive Reasoning

Use this skill to test whether a conclusion follows from stated premises, rules, or criteria.

Method Notes

  • Deductive reasoning moves from general rules or premises to a specific conclusion.
  • A deductive conclusion is only as reliable as the premises and the logic connecting them.
  • This method is strongest when rules, definitions, criteria, or constraints are explicit.
  • It should separate validity from truth: an argument can be logically valid but built on a false or weak premise.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • conclusion or decision to test
  • stated rules, criteria, principles, policies, or premises
  • facts of the specific case
  • scope boundary
  • exceptions or override conditions

If an input is missing, mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use when there are no clear premises or rules and the task is pattern discovery. Use inductive-reasoning, abductive-reasoning, or affinity-diagram first.

Step-by-Step Execution

Step Required input How to execute Output
State the conclusion Decision, claim, or recommendation. Write the conclusion in one testable sentence. Conclusion to test.
List premises Rules, criteria, policies, principles, definitions. Separate general premises from case-specific facts. Premise list.
Check premise quality Source, evidence, authority, scope. Mark each premise as strong, medium, weak, or missing. Premise quality table.
Map logic chain Premises, case facts, conclusion. Build the if-then path from premises to conclusion. Logic chain.
Test validity Logic chain, exceptions. Check whether the conclusion necessarily follows if premises are true. Validity judgment.
Check exceptions Scope, edge cases, override conditions. Identify conditions that weaken or reverse the conclusion. Exception list.
Rewrite conclusion Validity and premise quality. State a careful conclusion that matches the actual logic strength. Revised conclusion.

Read the full file on GitHub · 77 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 77 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 55ba5b630965

Subscribe to this mod's changes

deductive-reasoning is a skill published in the GitHub repository fzfclee/consulting-skills (4 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 707 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.