weighted-scorecard

weighted-scorecard is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from fzfclee/consulting-skills. It costs 58 tokens per session (730 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A method for comparing several options using required criteria, evidence, and weighted scores. Eligibility gates are checked first so a mandatory requirement cannot be hidden by a high total score.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess suppliers, partners, services, or procurement choices when criteria and evidence can be compared.
Why use it?
It makes detailed evaluations more consistent and shows when missing information or a failed requirement should affect the decision.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to assess suppliers, partners, services, or procurement choices when criteria and evidence can be compared.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add fzfclee/consulting-skills --skill weighted-scorecard
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fzfclee/consulting-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for weighted-scorecard

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for weighted-scorecard

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fzfclee/consulting-skills/weighted-scorecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 58 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 730 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00058 $0.00730
Opus 5 $0.00029 $0.00365
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00146
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00073

Measured 11d ago against content hash 75c1c2c239b5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

weighted-scorecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/weighted-scorecard/SKILL.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Weighted Scorecard

Use this skill to run Weighted Scorecard as a practical consulting method, not as a generic framework explanation.

Method Notes

  • Use eligibility gates before weighted scoring.
  • Add scoring anchors so reviewers score consistently.

Required Inputs

Collect or infer these inputs before execution:

  • evaluation object
  • criteria
  • weights
  • evidence and scoring scale

If an input is missing, do not block automatically. Mark it as missing, state the assumption used, and add a validation action.

When Not To Use

Do not use before options, criteria, scoring scales, and evidence are comparable. Do not let a strong total score average away a mandatory requirement or a decision-critical unknown.

Adjacent Methods

  • decision-matrix: one-time choice with explicit tradeoffs.
  • rice-scoring: Reach/Impact/Confidence/Effort backlog.
  • wsjf-prioritization: delay-cost sequencing.

Step-by-Step Execution

Step Required input How to execute Output
Set eligibility gates Minimum requirements, risk constraints, must-have criteria. Define pass/fail gates before weighted scoring. Eligibility gate list.
Define dimensions Evaluation goal, stakeholders, decision criteria. Choose weighted dimensions and scoring anchors. Scorecard rubric.
Collect evidence Vendor/option data, interviews, proposals, references. Attach evidence to each option and criterion. Evidence pack.
Score and normalize Rubric and evidence pack. Score every option consistently and calculate weighted totals. Weighted scorecard.
Decide with caveats Scores, gates, risks, sensitivity. Recommend winner, reserve option, or further diligence. Decision and caveats.

Output Template

### 1. Purpose And Eligibility
Evaluation purpose:
Entities:
Must-pass gates:
Evidence cut-off:

### 2. Dimensions And Anchors
| Dimension | Weight | Scoring anchor | Evidence standard |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 3. Scores
| Entity | Dimension scores | Normalized total | Evidence gaps |
|---|---|---|---|
|  |  |  |  |

### 4. Sensitivity And Governance
Recommendation:
Sensitivity:
Override rule:
Review / approval owner:

### Evidence And Next Decision
- Confirmed facts:
- Assumptions:
- Missing evidence:
- Next action, owner, and timing:
- Expected signal and decision threshold:

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 88 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 75c1c2c239b5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

weighted-scorecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository fzfclee/consulting-skills (4 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 730 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.