Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/bootstrap-solutionnpx skills add gaelic-ghost/socket --skill bootstrap-solutiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gaelic-ghost/socketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/bootstrap-solution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/bootstrap-solution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/bootstrap-solution.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01422 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
bootstrap-solution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bootstrap .NET Solution
Purpose
Create or guide a reproducible .NET solution scaffold without making C# the silent default.
The user should leave with a clear project layout, explicit F# or C# choice, predictable SDK behavior, and validation commands that prove the scaffold works.
When To Use
- Use this skill when creating a new .NET solution or project.
- Use this skill when adding a test project to an existing .NET repository.
- Use this skill when a repo needs
global.json, solution-level layout, or explicit validation commands. - Use this skill after
dotnet:choose-project-shapewhen the project shape is settled.
Source Check
Use repo-local .NET files, checked-out dependency sources, Dash MCP or Dash HTTP for installed .NET docsets, and then official Microsoft documentation when Dash/local coverage is missing or stale:
- .NET CLI documentation
dotnet newdocumentationglobal.jsondocumentationdotnet builddocumentationdotnet testdocumentation
Check the local SDK only when implementation actually needs it:
dotnet --info
dotnet --list-sdks
Required Inputs
- target path
- project or solution name
- project shape
- language: F#, C#, or mixed
- test project expectation
- test framework expectation; default to xUnit for new scaffolds unless the repo or user chooses another framework
- SDK pinning expectation
- git initialization or commit expectation
If the user has not selected F# or C#, ask before scaffolding.
Guidance Workflow
- Inspect the target:
- existing files
- git state
.slnor.slnxglobal.jsonDirectory.Build.props.fsprojor.csproj
- Confirm the project shape and language.
- Choose SDK behavior:
- use existing
global.jsonwhen present - add
global.jsonwhen reproducibility matters and the user accepts the SDK pin - avoid inventing a machine-local SDK path
- use existing
- Create projects with the
dotnetCLI. - Add project references.
- Add tests when the project has behavior worth preserving. Use the existing repo test framework if one exists; otherwise default new scaffolds to xUnit.
- Run validation.
- Report the generated paths and exact commands.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 151 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 4b1182e6d548
bootstrap-solution is a skill published in the GitHub repository gaelic-ghost/socket (7 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,422 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
tia-csharp-common
Internal reference skill — do NOT load directly from user queries.
addin-operations
TIA Portal Add-In development in Visual Studio Code: creating Add-In C# projects, adding Add-In templates, compiling and debugging Add-Ins, converting Add-Ins from older TIA Portal versions and configuring Add-In project parameters.
tia-plc-operations
C# Openness implementation of PLC software engineering.
tia-sivarc
C# TIA Portal Openness V21 automation for SIMATIC Visualization Architect (SiVArc): rule tables, rules and groups, library instances, tag/text definitions, tag member settings, expression resolution, layout exchange, definition upgrade, and generation.
tia-mac-module-builder
Siemens Modular Application Creator (MAC) and Module Builder development for TIA Portal V21. Use for TiaEquipmentModule lifecycle code, module models and use cases, generated/custom ownership, .tiares resources, packaging, and MAC qualification. Baseline: MAC V21.0.5 on .NET Framework 4.8.
tia-devices-general
C# Openness implementation of device-level operations.