Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/ios-runtime-forensics-workflownpx skills add gaelic-ghost/socket --skill ios-runtime-forensics-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gaelic-ghost/socketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/ios-runtime-forensics-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/ios-runtime-forensics-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/ios-runtime-forensics-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.00758 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00379 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
ios-runtime-forensics-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
iOS Runtime Forensics Workflow
Purpose
Provide two explicit evidence modes for a reproducible iOS Simulator issue: performance-trace for focused ETTrace/symbolicated latency or CPU work, and memory-graph for retained-object and leak ownership analysis. This skill owns evidence shape, not normal app build, launch, or UI driving.
When To Use
- Use
performance-tracefor launch/runtime latency, CPU-heavy stacks, or comparison traces. - Use
memory-graphfor leaks, retain cycles, memory growth, or objects that should release after a known interaction. - Route simulator discovery, build, install, launch, logs, screenshots, and UI driving to
xcode-build-run-workflow.
Single-Path Workflow
- Apply the Apple docs gate through
explore-apple-swift-docs. Confirm the current Xcode/Simulator evidence mechanism before acting. - Define one reproduction, start/stop boundary, target app build, simulator UDID, OS, Xcode version, and expected release or latency behavior.
- Select exactly one mode:
performance-traceormemory-graph. Do not mix CPU and ownership conclusions in one unsupported capture. - For
performance-trace, readreferences/performance-trace-evidence.md, capture a focused trace with matching symbols, and identify hot stacks only after symbolication. - For
memory-graph, readreferences/memory-graph-evidence.md, drive the release-producing flow, capture a memgraph, inspect app-owned retained types, and follow ownership evidence to the retaining path. - Make the smallest root-cause change, then recapture the same flow on the same simulator where practical.
- Report the exact capture boundary, tool/version context, what the artifact proves, what it does not prove, and the before/after delta.
Inputs
- reproducible simulator flow, target app/scheme, simulator UDID, and build configuration
- expected release/lifetime or performance boundary
- mode:
performance-traceormemory-graph - existing trace, memgraph, logs, screenshots, or symbol files when available
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 59 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 6dd52edca6fb
ios-runtime-forensics-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository gaelic-ghost/socket (7 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 758 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pipeline
Use when the user wants a feature idea taken end-to-end in one autonomous run — phrases like "run the whole pipeline", "take this feature from idea to finished branch", "brainstorm then build it autonomously", "do everything from idea to merged", "implement all phases without stopping". Triggers when they want…
craft
Use when a product idea is still vague and needs to become a clear definition of what to build — "let's craft an app like X", "help me define what I actually want", "clarify this idea before we plan it". Also use before planning or implementation when requirements, UX, domain behaviour, or technical preferences have…
scenario-planning
Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold…
ai-ml-governance
Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory…
ai-research-analyst
Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a…
implement-factory
Factory loop orchestrator for multi-feature or multi-component implementation manifests. Use for high-complexity work with parallel-eligible workstreams and holdout-scenario evaluation.