Claude Scholar is a semi-automated research assistant for academic research and software development, supporting literature review, coding, experiments, reporting, writing, and project knowledge management. Computer science and AI researchers use it across the research workflow with several coding-agent platforms; the catalogue contains its skills, commands, agents, hooks, plugin, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar/plugin install claude-scholarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/hook-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/hook-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/hook-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.03985 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00059 | $0.01992 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00797 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00398 |
Grade A, and why
hook-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to hook-development — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 713 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hook Development for Claude Code Plugins
Overview
Hooks are event-driven automation scripts that execute in response to Claude Code events. Use hooks to validate operations, enforce policies, add context, and integrate external tools into workflows.
Key capabilities:
- Validate tool calls before execution (PreToolUse)
- React to tool results (PostToolUse)
- Enforce completion standards (Stop, SubagentStop)
- Load project context (SessionStart)
- Automate workflows across the development lifecycle
Hook Types
Prompt-Based Hooks (Recommended)
Use LLM-driven decision making for context-aware validation:
{
"type": "prompt",
"prompt": "Evaluate if this tool use is appropriate: $TOOL_INPUT",
"timeout": 30
}
Supported events: Stop, SubagentStop, UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse
Benefits:
- Context-aware decisions based on natural language reasoning
- Flexible evaluation logic without bash scripting
- Better edge case handling
- Easier to maintain and extend
Command Hooks
Execute bash commands for deterministic checks:
{
"type": "command",
"command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate.sh",
"timeout": 60
}
Use for:
- Fast deterministic validations
- File system operations
- External tool integrations
- Performance-critical checks
Hook Configuration Formats
Plugin hooks.json Format
For plugin hooks in hooks/hooks.json, use wrapper format:
{
"description": "Brief explanation of hooks (optional)",
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [...],
"Stop": [...],
"SessionStart": [...]
}
}
Key points:
descriptionfield is optionalhooksfield is required wrapper containing actual hook events- This is the plugin-specific format
Example:
{
"description": "Validation hooks for code quality",
"hooks": {
"PreToolUse": [
{
"matcher": "Write",
"hooks": [
{
"type": "command",
"command": "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/validate.sh"
}
]
}
]
}
}
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/load-context.sh 1.7 KB runs code
- examples/validate-bash.sh 1.3 KB runs code
- examples/validate-write.sh 1.2 KB runs code
- references/advanced.md 9.9 KB
- references/migration.md 8.1 KB
- references/patterns.md 7.0 KB
- scripts/hook-linter.sh 4.1 KB runs code
- scripts/README.md 3.6 KB
- scripts/test-hook.sh 5.2 KB runs code
- scripts/validate-hook-schema.sh 5.0 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 713 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A f47e2d42f636
hook-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar (5,349 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 3,985 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to hook-development, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
stss
Reduce defensive disclaimers, stacked hedging, and self-protective narration in proposals and decision-facing writing. Use when the user asks to rewrite or audit a proposal, plan, research contribution, executive summary, or similar text for directness. Do not use for ordinary code work or unrelated prose.
intuitive-preflight
Turn a vague task, plan, issue, or "LGTM/go ahead" request into an approval-ready preflight contract before implementation starts. Use when the user wants prompt preflight, clearer scope, non-goals, context package, acceptance criteria, definition of done, verification, stop gates, the exact execution command, or…
intuitive-squash
Squash local GSD or agent-generated commit history into a clean, reviewable story while preserving important fixes. Use when the user asks to squash commits, clean git history, compress phase commits, prepare a branch before PR, compare aggressive vs moderate squash options, or preserve hotfix/security commits during…
do-it-core
Use when repository work needs a shared baseline for intent, facts, causal changes, and honest evidence.
do-it-handbook
Use when repeated rediscovery of stable project knowledge makes a small shared handbook useful.
do-it-context
Use when project terms, relationships, or invariants drift between user language, docs, and implementation.