Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GaosCode/PlanWeave --skill plan-recoverygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GaosCode/PlanWeaveWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaoscode/planweave/plan-recovery)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaoscode/planweave/plan-recovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaoscode/planweave/plan-recovery/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaoscode/planweave/plan-recovery"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaoscode/planweave/plan-recovery.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00954 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00382 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00095 |
Grade A, and why
plan-recovery scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan Recovery
Use this skill for abnormal PlanWeave execution state. Do not perform normal implementation or review work.
Quick Start
- Stop dispatching dependent work.
- Resolve the CLI entry and run
<pw> help recoveryfor exact commands. - Inspect package, state, results, and current/status/explain output; run doctor only for state/results consistency questions.
- Separate plan defects from runtime state/results drift.
- Use exact recovery commands for state writes when they express the needed repair; inspect files directly for evidence.
- Report what was repaired, what remains unsafe, and the next coordinator action.
Doctor Boundary
doctordetects narrow runtime state/results consistency issues such as stale current refs, orphan results, and state/index run drift.doctor --repairis not a general plan repair tool.- Do not use doctor to fix bad dependencies, unsafe parallelization, missing prompts, wrong review-gate design, unclear task/block granularity, invalid project graph, or schema-invalid package structure.
- For plan defects, report
NEEDS_PLAN_UPDATEand guide manual edits to the Plan Package, prompts, dependencies, or review gates.
Diagnose First
Check:
- active current refs and current feedback.
- block/task status and claim hints.
- latest run indexes versus state block
lastRunId. - orphan result artifacts.
- stale current refs.
- diverged or blocked refs and reasons.
- review attempts, feedback status, and re-review state.
- whether a retry is same-content idempotency or a fresh work revision.
Recovery Actions
- Use doctor before state/results repair; use repair only when the reported fix is narrow and evidence-backed.
- Read package/state/results directly when CLI output is incomplete, contradictory, or too summarized for diagnosis.
- If CLI cannot safely claim/submit, have the coordinator read package/state/results and manually assign exact refs until write-back is safe.
- Use blocked/unblocked commands for external prerequisites or temporary stops.
- Use diverged/resolve-divergence when implementation reality no longer matches the Plan Package.
- For submit partial success, look for persisted report/result artifacts before creating new runs or attempts.
- For feedback resolved but still current, re-check current/status before submitting anything.
- For parallel mismatch, compare sequential and parallel claimability before declaring no work.
- If parallel mismatch comes from package design, adjust dependencies, parallel safety, or review gate placement manually instead of running repair.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 85 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 6935189ef15d
plan-recovery is a skill published in the GitHub repository GaosCode/PlanWeave (424 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 954 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.